Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 53

Thread: Sling shot

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    6,646

    Sling shot

    So I have been reading and asking question on Ronnie's thread. He talks about keeping cycles to 8 weeks and usually sling shots them. I understand the whys and the how's. even proposed a cycle on the thread and he fined tuned it for me.

    But my question to all the members here is what would be the pros and cons of doing a sling shot.

    Cycle would be

    1-8 test e 500wk
    1-8 anavar 80-100mg Ed
    9-10 test e 200wk
    11-18 test e 500wk
    12-18 winny 50mg Ed
    18-20 test e 200wk

    Hcg 500wk 1-22
    Ldex .25 eod. 1-22
    Liv 52 and nac on cycle.

    Nolva 40-20-20-20
    Clomid 100-50-50-50

    I'm not by any means set on doing this. Would like to hear opinions on the pros and cons. I have the gear to do this but not sure if it is smart thing

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    PAC Northwest
    Posts
    72
    Quote Originally Posted by goode80 View Post
    So I have been reading and asking question on Ronnie's thread. He talks about keeping cycles to 8 weeks and usually sling shots them. I understand the whys and the how's. even proposed a cycle on the thread and he fined tuned it for me.

    But my question to all the members here is what would be the pros and cons of doing

    Cycle would be

    1-8 test e 500wk
    1-8 anavar 80-100mg Ed
    9-10 test e 200wk
    11-18 test e 500wk
    12-18 winny 50mg Ed
    18-20 test e 200wk

    Hcg 500wk 1-22
    Ldex .25 eod. 1-22
    Liv 52 and nac on cycle.

    Nolva 40-20-20-20
    Clomid 100-50-50-50

    I'm not by any means set on doing this. Would like to hear opinions on the pros and cons. I have the gear to do this but not sure if it is smart thing

    I was also curious about this myself. It was an interesting read. It seems it would only benefit those who wish to make a career out of competitive bodybuilding.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Blighty
    Posts
    4,456
    I thin you've misinterpreted the whole idea

    Running 8 weeks test e @ 500mg isn't going to do anything

    It's about running high doses for short periods of time coming off for 2 weeks then hitting it hard again.

    Say if your average cycle was 500mg for 10-12 weeks you would bump this up to say 1g a week for 8 weeks

    (Figures are not exact so don't quote me please. Illustration purposes only)

    Come down to 250mg for 2 weeks and then ramp up again

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    6,646
    Quote Originally Posted by panntastic View Post
    I thin you've misinterpreted the whole idea

    Running 8 weeks test e @ 500mg isn't going to do anything

    It's about running high doses for short periods of time coming off for 2 weeks then hitting it hard again.

    Say if your average cycle was 500mg for 10-12 weeks you would bump this up to say 1g a week for 8 weeks

    (Figures are not exact so don't quote me please. Illustration purposes only)

    Come down to 250mg for 2 weeks and then ramp up again
    Understood, and yeah u r right maybe I did misunderstand. But I did purpose it to him, and he adjusted it. Seems to advanced anyways for me. Lol.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Blighty
    Posts
    4,456
    Quote Originally Posted by goode80

    Understood, and yeah u r right maybe I did misunderstand. But I did purpose it to him, and he adjusted it. Seems to advanced anyways for me. Lol.
    It's not a novice thing that's for sure

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Defiling Myself
    Posts
    22,069
    It is a long time health commitment and concern. If you are on trt or want to be then it is for you. Long term goals. Not for the recreational bodybuilder IMO.With specific goals you have to weigh the possible long term effects against them. Risk will equal reward but is the reward worth the risk?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    With the 100 lb plates.
    Posts
    1,912
    I agree with Cape that this is NOT for the recreational lifter. But if you compete and are on TRT then the sling shot method is the way to go. It is a life long commitment once you start.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,267
    Imo you must not want to have children or live past 40 without major health issues if you do the cycle. But I am completely ignorant haven't done the hard research because just thinking about it makes me cringe

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,999
    Quote Originally Posted by snowblowjoe View Post
    Imo you must not want to have children or live past 40 without major health issues if you do the cycle. But I am completely ignorant haven't done the hard research because just thinking about it makes me cringe
    Live past 40 without major health issues? Oh really?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,267
    Patrick like I said I'm ignorant. There might be a way to do it healthy and not harmful and all that jazz but I just can't see it being possible

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,999
    Quote Originally Posted by snowblowjoe View Post
    Patrick like I said I'm ignorant. There might be a way to do it healthy and not harmful and all that jazz but I just can't see it being possible
    So one cycle like that a year will send you to the grave at 40? Ppl run 16 week cycles all the time

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    3,366
    I agree with Patrick to an extent. It would b harder to recover from doing two blast one cruise (18 weeks), but is possible with aggressive pct. however definitely not recommended for someone that knows very little in regards to aas

    -Chomp Chomp Chomp-Clink Clink Clink-

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,999
    Even if it sent you to trt, I don't consider that major health issues. You can be a healthy male on trt

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,267
    I wasn't talking 16 weeks I was talking blasting and cruising for life and yes you can be healthy on to TRT but that gets so expensive in knowing with bloodwork doctors visits prescription pickups etc etc

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Blighty
    Posts
    4,456
    Quote Originally Posted by patrick4588

    So one cycle like that a year will send you to the grave at 40? Ppl run 16 week cycles all the time
    Thing is its not one cycle its a lifestyle choice
    It's 8 on 2 off (low dose) and repeat until desired results are met.
    It can't be compared to a long cycle its completely different

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    1,710
    Quote Originally Posted by snowblowjoe View Post
    Imo you must not want to have children or live past 40 without major health issues if you do the cycle. But I am completely ignorant haven't done the hard research because just thinking about it makes me cringe
    This is just ridiculous! I'm 48, been running Ron's protocol for years and I'm healthier in all ways, including bloodwork, than I've been in 25 years. As far as having children, check out this pic. This was in the middle of a blast, after about 3 years of running Ron's STS. This kind of statement reminds me of people saying AAS make you dick shrink...
    Quote Originally Posted by Tron3219 View Post
    I agree with Patrick to an extent. It would b harder to recover from doing two blast one cruise (18 weeks), but is possible with aggressive pct. however definitely not recommended for someone that knows very little in regards to aas.

    -Chomp Chomp Chomp-Clink Clink Clink-
    Ron recommends it. I consider him one of the top people in this game at this point in time. Sure there are always risks, but with the proper use of HCG and current PCT, you have every chance of recovery.

    In short, Ron's the man as far as I'm concerned, you'll not find anyone who will say any different on here or anywhere else. A lot of very smart guy's like to do thing's different ways and a lot of Vets like to advise inexperienced guy's with the most conservative methods around mainly as damage control. Same reason Obama doesn't want anyone to have a gun. Here's me before Ron and after Ron. Now let's hear about health...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1149.JPG 
Views:	3013 
Size:	166.7 KB 
ID:	137402   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Jim Transformation2.jpg 
Views:	17331 
Size:	86.8 KB 
ID:	137403   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C360_2012-12-04-21-39-28.jpg 
Views:	1894 
Size:	402.8 KB 
ID:	137404  

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    234
    Quote Originally Posted by snowblowjoe
    Imo you must not want to have children or live past 40 without major health issues if you do the cycle. But I am completely ignorant haven't done the hard research because just thinking about it makes me cringe
    Gonna have to agree

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    1,710
    Quote Originally Posted by stackedbro View Post
    Gonna have to agree
    Even in the face of completely contradictory evidence? Opinionated or informed?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,267
    How you look on the outside has nothing to do with the effects on the inside of your body.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Blighty
    Posts
    4,456
    Titan what a transformation man well done

  21. #21
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,919
    Staying on cycle for 20 weeks will have consequences if you think the risks are worth trying then give it a try but for me running long cycles never agreed with me, I much prefer doing shorter cycle linked to a pre cycle prime which would give me more gains than any long cycle, less sides and are far more maintainable. Sling shot is for the advance competitor who isn't concerned about being on trt for life. There isn't one way what suit everyone you need to find out what compounds you respond best to and how your body responds to sides when staying on cycle for long periods of time, there is a massive down side to staying on cycle for a long time if your not already on trt.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Blighty
    Posts
    4,456
    Quote Originally Posted by marcus300
    Staying on cycle for 20 weeks will have consequences if you think the risks are worth trying then give it a try but for me running long cycles never agreed with me, I much prefer doing shorter cycle linked to a pre cycle prime which would give me more gains than any long cycle, less sides and are far more maintainable. Sling shot is for the advance competitor who isn't concerned about being on trt for life. There isn't one way what suit everyone you need to find out what compounds you respond best to and how your body responds to sides when staying on cycle for long periods of time, there is a massive down side to staying on cycle for a long time if your not already on trt.
    Wise words once again should be fully noted

    If any younger members read about sling shot or blast and cruise they should know the full ins and outs because its far more detrimental than just cycling

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    1,710
    Quote Originally Posted by panntastic View Post
    Titan what a transformation man well done
    Thanks Man. We all know it was more than just the AAS. 75% diet!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by snowblowjoe View Post
    How you look on the outside has nothing to do with the effects on the inside of your body.
    I do bloodwork every 3 months and get full physical examinations every 6 months. I check my BP daily. How do you gauge your health?

    If I wanted to know the pro's and con's of STS, I'd think you'd ask Ron. It's only partly to do with AAS. It involves training periodization, light and heavy weights as well as rep changes, set volume rotation, protein and carb cycling etc.

    It is an exceptional training system with or without AAS. Especially for older guys with joint problems or guy's dancing down the line of over training.
    Last edited by The Titan99; 04-17-2013 at 04:32 AM.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Defiling Myself
    Posts
    22,069
    Quote Originally Posted by The Titan99 View Post
    This is just ridiculous! I'm 48, been running Ron's protocol for years and I'm healthier in all ways, including bloodwork, than I've been in 25 years. As far as having children, check out this pic. This was in the middle of a blast, after about 3 years of running Ron's STS. This kind of statement reminds me of people saying AAS make you dick shrink...
    Ron recommends it. I consider him one of the top people in this game at this point in time. Sure there are always risks, but with the proper use of HCG and current PCT, you have every chance of recovery.

    In short, Ron's the man as far as I'm concerned, you'll not find anyone who will say any different on here or anywhere else. A lot of very smart guy's like to do thing's different ways and a lot of Vets like to advise inexperienced guy's with the most conservative methods around mainly as damage control. Same reason Obama doesn't want anyone to have a gun. Here's me before Ron and after Ron. Now let's hear about health...


    Holy Damn man. That is a complete body and life change. What was the time between those two pictures? Nicely done.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    1,710
    Quote Originally Posted by Capebuffalo View Post
    Holy Damn man. That is a complete body and life change. What was the time between those two pictures? Nicely done.
    About 20 months I think, but I can't swear to it. I was experimenting with the 20 beer a day, 2 racks of spare ribs diet then... I wouldn't recommend it...

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Defiling Myself
    Posts
    22,069
    Quote Originally Posted by The Titan99 View Post
    About 20 months I think, but I can't swear to it. I was experimenting with the 20 beer a day, 2 racks of spare ribs diet then... I wouldn't recommend it...
    Less than 2 yrs? Wow. Amazing.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,999
    Quote Originally Posted by The Titan99 View Post
    I do bloodwork every 3 months and get full physical examinations every 6 months. I check my BP daily. How do you gauge your health?
    But your insides have rotted, u didn't know?

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,267
    I do the same as you to check my health I wasn't saying you were in bad health I'm saying just because you look healthy on the outside that doesn't inherently mean you don't have any problems on the inside

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,999
    Quote Originally Posted by snowblowjoe View Post
    I wasn't saying you were in bad health
    That's exactly what u said. That there would be MAJOR health issues

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,267
    There's always exceptions. Major health issues is a generalization.

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,999
    You honestly think a 20 week sling shot cycle is so much more powerful and damaging than a normal 16 week cycle that someone will have major health problems by age 40? Seriously?

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,267
    Dude Patrick how many times I have to tell you I'm not talking about 16 or 20 week cycles I did too 12 week cycles back to back myself without any ill effects and those were my first two cycles ever. I'm talking about people that blast and cruise for the remainder of their lives I'm talking years and decades

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,999
    This thread is about a 20 week sling shot. To which u replied he would have serious health effects. Im not twisting your words around. Go back and read the OP and your response.

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,267
    Granted I can see how that didn't explain myself well. By cycle I meant blast and cruise cycle for years and years

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    1,710
    Alright, rather than parroting something you heard somewhere here's a PCT protocol that restores the VAST majority of hypogonadal men (due to steroid abuse) after being shut down for 52 or more weeks!! Even years.

    Aggressive PCT (shutdown for 16-52+ weeks)

    wk 1-8 Tamox 20mg/ED (40mg/ED first 7 days)
    wk 1-8 Tore 60mg/ED (120mg/ED first 14 days, 100mg/ED next 7 days)
    *HCG 250ius 2-3 times/wk (on cycle, every 8-10 weeks take a 2-3 week break [E2/PgR])
    *HCG should also be ramped to 500ius 14-21 days from PCT
    *Aromasin 10mg/EOD (on cycle)



    This is one of the most interesting papers I have seen on long term use and recovery.




    STREET C, SCALLY MC. Pharmaceutical Intervention of Anabolic Steroid Induced
    Hypogonadism - Our Success at Restoration of the HPG Axis. Medicine and Science in Sports
    and Exercise 2000;32(5)Suppl.


    High-dose anabolic androgenic steroid (AAS) administration results in hypogonadotropic
    hypogonadism (HH). Physical manifestations can include one or more of the following:
    depression, decreased sexual desire, impotence, feelings of apathy, testicular atrophy, and loss of
    muscle mass and strength. Due to feedback inhibition, laboratory values drop well below
    established physiologic norms: luteinizing hormone (LH) >3.6 IU/L, follicle stimulating
    hormone (FSH) >2.25 IU/L, and testosterone (T) >300 ng/dL. A search of the literature reveals
    an absence of studies dealing specifically with AAS induced HH, and restoration of normal
    endocrine function. We report on two interesting cases of AAS using bodybuilders who were
    brought out of the hypogonadal state. Blood samples were taken in the morning for both subjects
    and analyzed using chemiluminescence (Quest Diagnostics, Irvine, TX). Post-therapy samples
    were taken 15 days after the last hCG injection.

    Case 1: 6'0" 206 lbs. 33 yr old Caucasian male
    with a 10+ year history of steroid self-administration for bodybuilding and powerlifting. By his
    own admission he was a "heavy" user, taking from 500 mg/wk to 2+ grams/wk. Pre-treatment
    values: LH < 1.0 IU/L, T 191 ng/dL. One course of therapy (32 days) was given: 2,500 IU of
    hCG every 4 days (8 injections total), 50 mg clomiphene bid and 10 mg tamoxifen qd. Despite
    massive drug use patient was an exceptionally good responder. Post-treatment values: LH 5.2
    IU/L, T 1072 ng/dL.

    Case 2: 5'10" 184 lbs 36 yr old Caucasian male with a 2 yr history of
    continuous nandrolone use (200-400 mg/wk). Pre-values: LH < 1.0 IU/L, T 45 ng/dL.

    Treat 1
    (32 days): 2,500 IU hCG every 4 d (8 total), clomiphene (50 mg bid) and arimidex (1 mg qd).
    Post-values: LH < 1.0 IU/L, T 38 ng/dL.

    Treat 2 (60 days): 5,000 IU hCG every 4 days (4 inj
    total) followed by 2,500 IU hCG every 4 d (4 inj total), clomiphene (50 mg bid) and tamoxifen
    (10 mg qd). Post-values: LH > 1.4 IU/L, T 63 ng/dL.

    Treat 3 (32 days): 5,000 IU hCG qod (6 inj
    total) followed by 2,500 IU hCG qod (6 inj total) given simultaneously with menotropins 150 IU
    qod (6 inj total), clomiphene (50 mg bid) and tamoxifen (10 mg bid). Post-values: LH 9.8 IU/L,
    T 507 ng/dL.

    Restoration of the HPG axis, even in severe cases of hypogonadism, is possible
    with combined therapies and careful monitoring of the patient. With continued popularity of
    these drugs, long-term androgen deficiency is a health concern for former AAS users. Further
    research is needed in this area.



    So there is hope for those that have totally abused AAS for "years" or been on HRT and wish to recover.

    There's also this...

    Treatment of anabolic-androgenic steroid dependence: Emerging evidence and its implications.

    Kanayama G, Brower KJ, Wood RI, Hudson JI, Pope HG Jr.

    Biological Psychiatry Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA.
    Abstract

    Currently, few users of anabolic -androgenic steroids (AAS) seek substance abuse treatment. But this picture may soon change substantially, because illicit AAS use did not become widespread until the 1980s, and consequently the older members of this AAS-using population - those who initiated AAS as youths in the 1980s - are only now reaching middle age. Members of this group, especially those who have developed AAS dependence, may therefore be entering the age of risk for cardiac and psychoneuroendocrine complications sufficient to motivate them for substance abuse treatment. We suggest that this treatment should address at least three etiologic mechanisms by which AAS dependence might develop. First, individuals with body image disorders such as "muscle dysmorphia" may become dependent on AAS for their anabolic effects; these body image disorders may respond to psychological therapies or pharmacological treatments. Second, AAS suppress the male hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis via their androgenic effects, potentially causing hypogonadism during AAS withdrawal. Men experiencing prolonged dysphoric effects or frank major depression from hypogonadism may desire to resume AAS, thus contributing to AAS dependence. AAS-induced hypogonadism may require treatment with human chorionic gonadotropin or clomiphene to reactivate neuroendocrine function, and may necessitate antidepressant treatments in cases of depression inadequately responsive to endocrine therapies alone. Third, human and animal evidence indicates that AAS also possess hedonic effects, which likely promote dependence via mechanisms shared with classical addictive drugs, especially opioids. Indeed, the opioid antagonist naltrexone blocks AAS dependence in animals. By inference, pharmacological and psychosocial treatments for human opioid dependence might also benefit AAS-dependent individuals."

    OK, sorry for the copy and paste fest, and I don't want to say this as a free pass to some of the new, the young, or the irresponsible, but the 20 weeks cycles that Ron proposes aren't the equivalent of driving your car off a cliff.

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,999
    Nolva and torem work very well together

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    1,710
    Quote Originally Posted by patrick4588 View Post
    Nolva and torem work very well together
    Yea, Torem is better than clomid by far IMO.

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Defiling Myself
    Posts
    22,069
    Quote Originally Posted by patrick4588 View Post
    This thread is about a 20 week sling shot. To which u replied he would have serious health effects. Im not twisting your words around. Go back and read the OP and your response.
    I wasn't thinking 20 weeks. My sling shot is 8 on 2 off and changing esters for quiet a while longer than 20 weeks. That's why I commented on not for the rec. user. 20 weeks I would expect a full recovery. 24 months not so much.

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    6,646
    This thread turned sideways. But kinda got the info I needed. Was mainly curious because when Ronnie talks about receptors burning out after 8 wks. So since I had the gear and wanted to get everything I could out of this cycle I was interested in the pros and cons.

    Sling shot is definitely not in my future. But was a thought.

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,153
    Quote Originally Posted by snowblowjoe View Post
    Patrick like I said I'm ignorant. There might be a way to do it healthy and not harmful and all that jazz but I just can't see it being possible
    You obviously have not read through my thread!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •