Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Running Tren higher then Test?

  1. #1

    Running Tren higher then Test?

    I have read some threads from other sites about running tren higher then test for maximum gains. The goal of this was to keep Test levels at a therapeutic level while leaving receptors more open for the tren. I kind of makes sense, but just curious what others think and if you have tried this and what the results were. I love tren, sides don't effect me to much. I was thinking maybe doing a 10 week cycle of tren 200mg and test prop 100mg EOD. I usually run the tren at 100 and the test at 125-150mg. Getting lean and strong with some size is always the goal for me.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    There are more than enough receptors to go around...no need to fight over em.

    The idea of low test is to limit the excess test causing elevated E2 issues. Some like it higher, some lower and even others equal.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Defiling Myself
    Posts
    22,069
    I like my test/tren ratio 1:3
    I run it both ways. Prefer tren higher. Just a personal thing

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200

  5. #5
    austinite's Avatar
    austinite is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cialis, Texas
    Posts
    31,155
    Either way works. Just have to see what works best for you.
    ~ PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR SOURCE CHECKS ~

    "It's human nature in a 'more is better' society full of a younger generation that expects instant gratification, then complain when they don't get it. The problem will get far worse before it gets better". ~ kelkel

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Kitchen, Gym, Kitchen....
    Posts
    13,716
    Everything's always a little better w/more test for me.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Between mrs.misery's legs
    Posts
    5,091
    600mg Tren E
    400mg Tren A
    300mg Test Cyp
    A week for 8 weeks

    Love it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    196
    This is my next cycle late next winter. Was thinking having 200mg test and 600mg tren and 50mg daily dianabol

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,999
    Quote Originally Posted by knuckles69 View Post
    This is my next cycle late next winter. Was thinking having 200mg test and 600mg tren and 50mg daily dianabol
    Sounds awesome. Bp will be astronomical

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    SoCal USA
    Posts
    1,404
    Quote Originally Posted by Lunk1 View Post
    There are more than enough receptors to go around...no need to fight over em.

    The idea of low test is to limit the excess test causing elevated E2 issues. Some like it higher, some lower and even others equal.
    The thought behind it is that tren is much stronger (about 5x more anabolic) so you let it do the work, while the test is there for TRT reasons. In addition lower test will keep E2 problems lower, in turn keeping prolactin related issues more in check also.
    As a few people have stated, you can try it either way and see what you like better. To each his own

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    GTA
    Posts
    14,263
    Currently on Test E 500mg/week and Tren E 600mg/week loving it. I may try even lower test next go around with more Tren.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New York, New York
    Posts
    177
    Great thread! This is where I am confused though, I've been running sust@ 500mgs this 1st 3 weeks and will be starting to run tri -tren along side it soon. The dose per ml is 360mg. After reading this I almost feel like backing off a little on the sust and adjusting my tren dose higher then 360 a week. Bad idea?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Defiling Myself
    Posts
    22,069
    Quote Originally Posted by mr.slippyfist69 View Post
    Great thread! This is where I am confused though, I've been running sust@ 500mgs this 1st 3 weeks and will be starting to run tri -tren along side it soon. The dose per ml is 360mg. After reading this I almost feel like backing off a little on the sust and adjusting my tren dose higher then 360 a week. Bad idea?

    First why a tri tren? Second what's your experience with tren?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Micanopy/Gainesville, Fl
    Posts
    5,868
    Quote Originally Posted by mr.slippyfist69 View Post
    Great thread! This is where I am confused though, I've been running sust@ 500mgs this 1st 3 weeks and will be starting to run tri -tren along side it soon. The dose per ml is 360mg. After reading this I almost feel like backing off a little on the sust and adjusting my tren dose higher then 360 a week. Bad idea?
    I would like to know also. ...crazy mike

  15. #15
    jimmyinkedup's Avatar
    jimmyinkedup is offline Disappointment* Known SCAMMER - Do Not Trust *
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Scamming my brothers
    Posts
    11,285
    The benefit isnt in receptor availability as Lunk already said. The benefit is with a lower test dose it is easier to manage estrogen which allows you to more easily manage sides. Also why not let the more potent steroid do more work?
    As was also mentioned this is an individual thing but for me personally running test low and tren high was one of the best changes i ever made as far as cycle protocol goes.

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmyinkedup View Post
    The benefit isnt in receptor availability as Lunk already said. The benefit is with a lower test dose it is easier to manage estrogen which allows you to more easily manage sides. Also why not let the more potent steroid do more work?
    As was also mentioned this is an individual thing but for me personally running test low and tren high was one of the best changes i ever made as far as cycle protocol goes.
    I've definitely heard a lot of anecdotal evidence from others as well that this is the preferred way to handle cycling test and Tren. Tough though since everyone responds differently

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    New York, New York
    Posts
    177
    Ran tren last cycle. Had great results with mild sides. The worst I would have to say was the sleep issue. Why tren? Last cycle I would have to say I was just curious, this time, because I clearly remember the gains and the way I felt while on cycle. I was an animal both in the gym and at the plate. Could not keep a fork and knife out of my hands!

  18. #18
    Tren has always done me wonders, so I'm going to give it a try. Do tren 200mg and test prop 50mg EOD x 10 weeks , maybe add some var at 80mg daily x 8 weeks. That's the plan

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •