Rule for source checks??

[topnotch]

I dont blame you at all ima******ger...as you've said before, this place isn't for gaining sources, it's for gaining knowledge...there's no reason to put yourself at risk, or any sources at risk for that matter, at this time especially...people should be understanding...if they were in your shoes, they'd feel the same way...but i'd just like to say thanks, b/c you've brought a lot of good knowledge here, and i appreciate you and the other mods and vets doing your things, and helping all of us out here...thanks

[Auss11e]

I dont blame you at all ima******ger...as you've said before, this place isn't for gaining sources, it's for gaining knowledge...there's no reason to put yourself at risk, or any sources at risk for that matter, at this time especially...people should be understanding...if they were in your shoes, they'd feel the same way...but i'd just like to say thanks, b/c you've brought a lot of good knowledge here, and i appreciate you and the other mods and vets doing your things, and helping all of us out here...thanks

Totally agree aswell, great job all senior members/moderators do here. I do understand and i wouldn't want the rules to change.
I was just thinking (god help us) but the rules her seem to be followed very well compared to other forums. My question is: As far as protecting sources for obvious reasons does anyone think that some of the more "relaxed" forums may be not so careful in comprimising the chance of good sources getting busted?? I don't know, does this happen cos i'd imagine it would mean a huge influx of scammers flooding the forums!!