U.N. report: Urgent action needed on 'severe' climate change

[Fat Guy]

That is only your opinion and you're entitled to it. There is also conflicting evidence against this....Please read these threads.


http://forums.steroid.com/showthread.php?t=314566
http://forums.steroid.com/showthread.php?t=320707
http://forums.steroid.com/showthread.php?t=318077

I have read all of these threads before and they are lacking to say the least. I know you believe this is a partisan issue but the bottom line is it is not. The world majority of the scientific community has concluded through empirical review that it is an issue and will be a catastrophe if something is not done about it soon. These are the top scientific minds in the world saying this.

I repeat this is not a political issue. However, there are big money interest groups out there that want to turn it into a political issue because the bottom line is they have much to protect with all their profits and power made off of the world's consumption of fossil fuels. I understand why they put their best spin doctors on this issue but the evidence in this case is refutable. There is a reason the 2 top producing countries in the world of green house gas emission has not or will not likely sign the treaty… $$$

[Dizz28]

I have read all of these threads before and they are lacking to say the least. I know you believe this is a partisan issue but the bottom line is it is not. The world majority of the scientific community has concluded through empirical review that it is an issue and will be a catastrophe if something is not done about it soon. These are the top scientific minds in the world saying this.

I repeat this is not a political issue. However, there are big money interest groups out there that want to turn it into a political issue because the bottom line is they have much to protect with all their profits and power made off of the world's consumption of fossil fuels. I understand why they put their best spin doctors on this issue but the evidence in this case is refutable. There is a reason the 2 top producing countries in the world of green house gas emission has not or will not likely sign the treaty… $$$

I know....because it's crap...once again, you have your opinions...that's why America is a great country...you are afforded the opportunity to have your own personal views...even if they are wrong....lol

[Dizz28]

I have read all of these threads before and they are lacking to say the least. I know you believe this is a partisan issue but the bottom line is it is not. The world majority of the scientific community has concluded through empirical review that it is an issue and will be a catastrophe if something is not done about it soon. These are the top scientific minds in the world saying this.

I don't think so, scooter

that was one of the first threads I posted.

[gixxerboy1]

The Earth goes through cycles. Its a natural; process. We didn't destroy the Earth and the climate in 100 years of being industrialised.

Are we having an effect on some things. Yes. Should we make pollution better? Yes.

[dece870717]

I think this is just another way of government scaring people, getting them all riled up, we end up cooperating with whatever they want us to do and then by doing so we just give away more of our freedom and they get more power/control.

[Logan13]

I think this is just another way of government scaring people, getting them all riled up, we end up cooperating with whatever they want us to do and then by doing so we just give away more of our freedom and they get more power/control.

true.....

[Fat Guy]

The Earth goes through cycles. Its a natural; process. We didn't destroy the Earth and the climate in 100 years of being industrialised.

Are we having an effect on some things. Yes. Should we make pollution better? Yes.

Gixxer The unbiased science is in and it concludes that this is not a natural process, like major fossil fuel industries would like the majority of people to believe or corporate sponsored authors Avery & Singer are saying. I think if you do some homework you will find what is real. Here is a link to counterpoint why this global warming process is not a natural process.


http://www.realclimate.org/index.php...pable-hot-air/

I hope this helps

[soulstealer]

Personally I think people just need to stop and realise whats going on...

Is there a natural cycle of warms and cold snaps over periods including ice ages... YES they are caused by levels of CO2 and other gases which cause a chain reaction causing certain events....

Are we accelerating this process... YES by artificial production of these gases.... we are causing it to happen at an unbelievably fast rate.....

What happens when the polar ice caps melt and concentration of CO2 gas gets too high.... A GODDAMN ICEAGE!!! thats what happens.... then the earth slowly warms back up....

[Fat Guy]

I don't think so, scooter

that was one of the first threads I posted.

My name is not scooter... OK Dizzy?


And if you look up the term “MAJORITY” in the dictionary it means the greater part or number in a group. What that means for this article is the majority or greater number of top scientist have concluded that global warming is a real issue… but hey you believe what you want because I know you know something more, right?

And if you think I am taking some right wing rag piece written by Dennis Avery who is the senior editor of the Hudson Institute which is a corporate sponsored U.S. think tank… well I am not as easily led as you are then. I always follow the money trail…

Have a nice day Dizzy