Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Ron Paul: Angry White Man

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,740
    Quote Originally Posted by LawMan018 View Post
    If this were true, wouldn't it be mainstream news? I mean, it might be old, but everybody is trying to dig up dirty little secrets about each candidate, it couldn't be that hard to find. I, being a Democrat, do hope that Ron Paul wins the primaries and I will denounce my politicial standing to vote for him because I believe his message and what he stands for.
    It's strange that it is being brought up about him now. Usually shit like this is dug up on top tier candidates only. The only real negatives that I have heard about him stem from far-left liberals.
    Last edited by Logan13; 01-08-2008 at 03:23 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    3,435
    Well, if he does well in NH I expect a huge smear compaign to ensue. It's not uncommon, you just have to be able to do your own research and come to a logical conclusion based on what you believe to be true.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    4,264
    Quote Originally Posted by Logan13 View Post
    It's strange that it is being brought up about him now. Usually shit like this is dug up on top tier candidates only. The only real negatives that I have heard about him stem from far-left liberals.

    Well . . . Who's gonna post the "Anti-Smear" post to counteract the that you posted, and incorrectly leads readers to conclude that

    RON PAUL is an ANGRY WHITE MAN!


    -------------------


    Ya, why not volunteer you?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    US
    Posts
    744
    Quote Originally Posted by Tock View Post
    Well . . . Who's gonna post the "Anti-Smear" post to counteract the that you posted, and incorrectly leads readers to conclude that

    RON PAUL is an ANGRY WHITE MAN!
    He didn't write those articles, Jesus. The worst thing you can say is that he trusted someone to run the newsletter that he shouldn't have and that he didn't pay attention to what they were publishing (using his name).

    This doesn't make him implicitly agreeing with the articles. It doesn't make him an "Angry White Man" (love that catch phrase, never heard that before...). He fired the guy as soon as he found out and even openly took the blame for the OTHER PERSON'S actions.

    I have a feeling that while delivering over 4,000 babies and being a 10 term congressman he had quite a few other things to look after than a independent newsletter that he stopped working on years ago.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •