ok, i don't want say too much space on kales thread here... I already rambled on a lot... science does work by falsification like you said, but with that being said... you can't conclude something and then say disprove this or it is fact. That is not fair or open minded either.
The biggest thing for me in the fossil record is that how many years would you say that it took for a monkey to become a man? million? more? less? ok, so how many fossil records of original monkey? why would the original be around and not the evolutionary process in between (specially if took millions of years) either be found or still occurring in between? dinosaurs existed before man right? if this is the case why do we find fossil records of this and none of the changes needed to support the theory of the evolution of species. by survival of the fittest the monkeys or apes would be gone and replaced by man with a long history of fossils and records. I just don't agree with that and think the theory it is really flawed for many of the species... it is accepted by many, but not by all.





Reply With Quote