Results 1 to 40 of 47

Thread: var/primo Vs Var/low test 2nd Cycle?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Thanks for input Kfrost.

    I am also swaying towards a and c but out of interest, would you like cycle b more if the primo was increased to 12 or 14 weeks?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    torrance,ca
    Posts
    3,041
    Quote Originally Posted by xweighted View Post
    Thanks for input Kfrost.

    I am also swaying towards a and c but out of interest, would you like cycle b more if the primo was increased to 12 or 14 weeks?
    yes but with something else, primo is very mild and works much better when stacked with something else. It is also pretty surpressive so running it alone for the extended 4-6 weeks is not worth it. IMO the cons out weigh the pros for that option. Primo is good but by itself it's so mild its really not worth it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •