I know he is, but I don't know why he is. You would think he's not that foolish.
I think it has a lot to do with the government subsidizing of corn. Why would farmers continue to grow wheat when they are rewarded for growing corn for ethanol purposes? If the government let the market decide what it needed than farmers would grow corn for ethanol if/when there was a demand for ethanol. When that demand was met farmers would stop growing it, but now the government forces a demand for ethanol and farmers stop producing wheat in order to produce corn. If there is a surplus of corn the government will just buy it up from the farmers. It doesn't make sense to me and it seems like we're just trying to appease "environmental lobbyist."





I know he is, but I don't know why he is. You would think he's not that foolish.
Reply With Quote