well i e-mailed the guy my topic- because he still has to necessarily "approve" of the topic (not going to offend anyone).....anyway we have another speech later in the semester that'll be more persuasive than informative, he feels like my speech may be more persuasive and i should save the steroids topic for the next speech- and try and get people to open their eyes on the situation really going on there....heres the e-mail he sent me:i guess i could get up there and explain what anabolic-androgenic steroids are but that'd just be pointless and stupid- most of the class wouldn't care.....i read the rick collins testimony and it is perfect for quoting so i'm going to hold onto this topic and probably use it next time...because well, i do have to agree that by using that i'd try and persuade more than just inform.....anyone know of a crisis thats goin unnoticed to the general public- that if they found out about it, it'd shock them.....maybe like the child soldiers in africa or something lol i'm getting less exciting about giving this speech because i feel like i'm limited nowWhat I am saying is that you sound like you are arguing a point and
that is not to be done for the informative... You have to wait and do
that for persuasive...
Now you can inform us about it if you feel you WON'T TRY AND PERSUADE...