First of all, thanks a lot for your reply and also thanks for the reply in the other thread I started, I really appreciate it! This is very useful information.
So I suppose the known side effects, possible uncontrolled growth of malignant cells, growth of bones etc would not be an issue with IGF. Right?
I've done some readin myself and came up with a text where the author explained how the IGF behaves exactly like IGF LR3, meaning it will get out of the muscle tissue and into your bloodstream. But there it will be metabolized quickly, while IGF LR3 cannot be metabolized by the responsible enzymes.
So this would mean that the dosage used should be exactly the same, since all binding sites will be saturated at a certain dosage. One could assume that the dosage can be upped since it will not cause undesired growth in other boy parts, but I suppose that's not true. Have there been studies on this?
Again, thanks a lot for your help! This material sounds even more appealing than IGF LR3 in regards to muscle growth, but the positive side effects, the "rejuvenating" aspects, the strengthening of bone tissue and connective tissue in ligaments etc will not be observed. Aye, correct me if I'm wrong.
Have you personally tried IGF (not LR3)?
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by c-funk
