All Out Strength: Halotestin vs Tren

[one8nine]

No shit sherlock. That doesn't mean he's the supreme ruler of this thread and he can just bark out order like stay on topic when I make one post disagreeing with somebody about Tren. Which was basically on topic too. I have a thread about Tren on the front page and it went way off topic but not going to disrespect the people who I'm asking for help , like this OP did.

good thing you didnt help at all
AARs dont matter here
please explain why
test = 100/100
tren = 500/500
halo = 1900/850

but tren has more sides and builds more mass
explain how the aar was relavent to this thread
all out strength halo vs tren

anyone can quote a profile, good job

[john1181]

good thing you didnt help at all
AARs dont matter here
please explain why
test = 100/100
tren = 500/500
halo = 1900/850

but tren has more sides and builds more mass
explain how the aar was relavent to this thread
all out strength halo vs tren

anyone can quote a profile, good job

bro i'm guessing it has to do with how good each binds to the androgen receptors..its conversion rates to est or prog...i think the human body's androgen receptors can at a normal level support the trens 500/500 to a point but not the 1900 of halo...as for the strength gains are their it probably gives off more aggression or maybe its aar is more towards muscle contractions rather than muscle building..thats my guess..weird shit tho

[football3355]

bro i'm guessing it has to do with how good each binds to the androgen receptors..its conversion rates to est or prog...i think the human body's androgen receptors can at a normal level support the trens 500/500 to a point but not the 1900 of halo...as for the strength gains are their it probably gives off more aggression or maybe its aar is more towards muscle contractions rather than muscle building..thats my guess..weird shit tho

that is wierd and brings up questions. One8nine, what do you think man?