Gay Marriage: support or oppose?

[CeeLo]

I know that I am going to offend someone, but I will be the first to step up and go against the grain.

I think it sends the wrong message to kids and I think that it is in-humane. I think that it should be Adam and Eve and Not Adam and Adam or Eve and Eve. Just doesn't make sense to me how that stuff could be pleasurable.

I would not want my kids to see 2 guys loving up on each other in public.

[gixxerboy1]

I know that I am going to offend someone, but I will be the first to step up and go against the grain.

I think it sends the wrong message to kids and I think that it is in-humane. I think that it should be Adam and Eve and Not Adam and Adam or Eve and Eve. Just doesn't make sense to me how that stuff could be pleasurable.

I would not want my kids to see 2 guys loving up on each other in public.

there is nothing wrong with having a different opinion. but have a reason for it. adam and eve or steve in not a reason. Its a lame saying.

about what is pleasurable. first what does it matter? There are plenty of shit straight people do that doesn't seem pleasurable to me. And im sure a bj probably feels the same no matter what sex is giving it.

About not wanting your kids to see it. Again there are lots of things i wouldnt want my kids to see be again what does that matter. also if 2 gays are kissing your kids are going to be less damaged seeing it if the guys aren't married? Make no sense to me.

[scibble]

there is nothing wrong with having a different opinion. but have a reason for it. adam and eve or steve in not a reason. Its a lame saying.

about what is pleasurable. first what does it matter? There are plenty of shit straight people do that doesn't seem pleasurable to me. And im sure a bj probably feels the same no matter what sex is giving it.

About not wanting your kids to see it. Again there are lots of things i wouldnt want my kids to see be again what does that matter. also if 2 gays are kissing your kids are going to be less damaged seeing it if the guys aren't married? Make no sense to me.

i dont understand why you feel you have to stand up to everyone's opinion here. let people voice their opinions, which is what this thread is for, or is it just a means of getting as many people as possible to agree with you and to bash everyone who doesn't tow the line? my mind is still free thank you.

[gixxerboy1]

i dont understand why you feel you have to stand up to everyone's opinion here. let people voice their opinions, which is what this thread is for, or is it just a means of getting as many people as possible to agree with you and to bash everyone who doesn't tow the line? my mind is still free thank you.

where did i bash anyone?

I made comments about a couple of his reasons. None called him names or belittled anyone. To me they didnt seem like real reasons. I was hoping for him to explain more. and he did in another post.

[dece870717]

Marriage was created by God/Religion, God/Religion therefore defines and sets rules of marriage. Government has no business in marriage period and I can't understand why we let the government even have any part in the marriage process. People want to say oh religion has no business in government with separation of church and state BS that doesn't exist and yet take a religious ritual and make it a part of the government/state.

[gixxerboy1]

Marriage was created by God/Religion, God/Religion therefore defines and sets rules of marriage. Government has no business in marriage period and I can't understand why we let the government even have any part in the marriage process. People want to say oh religion has no business in government with separation of church and state BS that doesn't exist and yet take a religious ritual and make it a part of the government/state.

I agree with you. But being married gives you certian rights. My church would allow me to marry because i didnt finish certain things with them. I agree a church should be allowed not to marry someone. But if the state is going to marry people then they should marry everyone. If a state marriage is called a civil union then it shoudl be for everyone.

[Kratos]

i dont understand why you feel you have to stand up to everyone's opinion here. let people voice their opinions, which is what this thread is for, or is it just a means of getting as many people as possible to agree with you and to bash everyone who doesn't tow the line? my mind is still free thank you.

I have to agree, although I support gay marriage, this is not a debate. Only one view point is able to be openly expressed.

[gixxerboy1]

I have to agree, although I support gay marriage, this is not a debate. Only one view point is able to be openly expressed.

i guess i didnt realise i was doing that. I apologise to every that felt i bashed them

[Coop77]

I know that I am going to offend someone, but I will be the first to step up and go against the grain.

I think it sends the wrong message to kids and I think that it is in-humane. I think that it should be Adam and Eve and Not Adam and Adam or Eve and Eve. Just doesn't make sense to me how that stuff could be pleasurable.

I would not want my kids to see 2 guys loving up on each other in public.

If you think gays are immoral/gross/whatever, fine, don't marry one. Teach your kids it's wrong. But don't try to write your personal morals into law.
Other people's civil rights supersede your right to not be uncomfortable.