Obama's Top 100 verified undisputed factual list of Lies!

[Tock]

Someone with his limited experience and history should not ever even be considered as our President.

Or vice president.

[spywizard]

Or vice president.

yea, the country has been destroyed in the past all the times the VP has to run the country..

[Diary of a Mad-man]

yea, the country has been destroyed in the past all the times the VP has to run the country..

Do you remember when James A. Garfield got shot, and Chester A. Arthur screwed up everything, like passing the Chinese Exclusion act?!?!?!

Just kidding , that was a Democratic congress that passed that too.

[Tock]

Originally Posted by Tock
Or vice president.

yea, the country has been destroyed in the past all the times the VP has to run the country..

Perhaps you haven't heard about this little tid-bit of info . . . Shows how our current lying VP got the Republican House Majority Leader (Dick Armey) to change his vote in favor of the war. If it wasn't for that, then the US probably wouldn't have started up this needless war in Iraq . . .

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,4927995.story

Former GOP House leader says Cheney misled him on Iraq




The vice president told Dick Armey, who in 2002 spoke against going to war, that Saddam Hussein had direct ties to Al Qaeda and would soon have a suitcase nuclear weapon, a new book says.

From the Washington Post
September 16, 2008


WASHINGTON -- A GOP congressional leader who was wavering on giving President Bush the authority to wage war in late 2002 said Vice President Dick Cheney misled him by saying that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had direct personal ties to Al Qaeda terrorists and was making rapid progress toward a suitcase nuclear weapon, according to a new book by Washington Post reporter Barton Gellman.

Cheney's accusations, described by former House Majority Leader Dick Armey of Texas, came in a classified one-on-one briefing in the vice president's office in the Capitol.



The threat Cheney described went far beyond public statements that have been criticized for relying on "cherry-picked" intelligence of unknown reliability. There was no intelligence to support the vice president's private assertions, Gellman reports.

Armey had spoken out against the coming war, and his opposition gave cover to Democrats who feared the political costs of appearing weak. Armey reversed his position after Cheney told him, he said, that the threat from Iraq was "more imminent than we want to portray to the public at large."

Cheney said, according to Armey, that Iraq's "ability to miniaturize weapons of mass destruction, particularly nuclear," had been "substantially refined since the first Gulf War."


Cheney linked that threat to Hussein's alleged ties to Al Qaeda, Armey said, explaining "we now know they have the ability to develop these weapons in a very portable fashion, and they have a delivery system in their relationship with organizations such as Al Qaeda."

"Did Dick Cheney . . . purposely tell me things he knew to be untrue?" Armey said. "I seriously feel that may be the case. . . . Had I known or believed then what I believe now, I would have publicly opposed [the war] resolution right to the bitter end."
-----------------------------------------------

Vice Presidents are getting more influential, and for god's sake, why would we have a goober governor from Alaska who has presided over a state with a smaller population than the city of Baltimore (that's in Maryland, btw)? WTF is wrong with McCain? Aren't there female Republicans with more experience than Palin? Two that come to mind are the women senators from Maine (Olympia Snow) and and Texas (Hutchinson).

Lordy lordy lordy . . .

Nevertheless, anyone will be an improvement over Cheney . . .