i've always been told this as well but don't know the rationale....can someone clarify?
i was considering EQ for my last cycle and a couple buddies claimed it wasn't even worth the money, i'd still like to run it in my next bulker maybe though.
Same here. I never understood this, does this mean one should start the EQ 2-3 weeks before a 12 week test cycle for the "slow steady gains" reported from Eq and end both at the same time? Or should you start both at same time and run the Eq a couple weeks longer? How does that effect PCT start times?
no you do not need start eq before the test. and dont run it longer than the test. it needs to be ran longer because it is a weak compound and gains come much slower than other compounds. To make it worth while (although I never think its worth while) you should run it for at least 14wks. what this means is you must extend your entire cycle. run your test to 16-18wks depending on how long you run the eq 14-16wks.
I personally do not support running any compounds without test. The human body particulary males need test to function properly. Even though the eq had not kicked in yet does not mean it cannot have a negative impact, it is still active in the body the moment you start it. you may or may not see any negative effects within these first two wks or at all but i do not condone it so I say no to starting eq before test. Either run a longer cycle, run the eq shorter than we have recommended and not recieve max befefits or pick a different compound.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)