take it like he is saying that "i have disproved evolution, their for i have proven creation" that is the normal scientific approach (he was formal an non-beliver and a scientist... his original mission was to prove God wrong, oops, he proved God right and became a beleiver)
their is hope for you too bro (lol)
i thank you for keeping this debate fairly clean of bad attitudes - i appricate you opinion and you position - i DO NOT AGREE WITH IT, i was in you shoes earlier in my life
Copied from the comments section of the video
Hovind's "predictions" are not predictions, they are observations interpreted to support his view. In order to test a theory you predict phenomena not yet observed and formulate experiments in order to test these predictions. The engineer who claims to be the least qualified is wrong. Hoving has NO qualifications from acredited sources. His doctorate comes from a diploma mill bible college. I have read his PHD thesis and it is hilarious. A PHD is awarded to someone who furthers the knowledge in a chosen field. Hovind's thesis, apart from being incomplete, is based on ideas refuted before he wrote it. There is no original research. It is also incomplete. Kent Hovind is a liar, he uses arguments he knows to be untrue. I have seen him construct straw man "big bang" argument based on a text book explanation of the generation of a star. Hovind cannot tell the difference between the birth of a star and the expansion of time and space. Anyone who treats this man with anything other than contempt is fool.
Wow...so many fallacies. I don't even know where to start. Using "dogs produce dogs" to make his point and the guy expects people to take him seriously. (I kinda stated the same thing before reading the comments)
My parents raised me to be religious, so I kinda went the opposite way.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)