Results 1 to 37 of 37

Thread: Socialism: Good On Paper, Not In Reality

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Vegas, bitches!!!
    Posts
    3,855
    ^^^welfare (1860's), medicaid(1960's), disability(1930's), and unemployment(1930s and partially paid for by employers) have been around for a very long time and funded by taxpayers (both public and private).
    Last edited by BgMc31; 04-03-2009 at 07:11 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    R.I.P. T-MOS
    Posts
    4,944
    Quote Originally Posted by BgMc31 View Post
    ^^^welfare (1860's), medicaid(1960's), disability(1930's), and unemployment(1930s and partially paid for by employers) have been around for a very long time and funded by taxpayers (both public and private).
    that's besides the point... we live in a nation that is supposed to be capitalistic without government involvment, but the gov involvment has grown dramatically recently.... when does a country become socialist?? when the government gets involved.. simple

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by jamyjamjr View Post
    that's besides the point... we live in a nation that is supposed to be capitalistic without government involvment, but the gov involvment has grown dramatically recently.... when does a country become socialist?? when the government gets involved.. simple
    who builds roads? where do you go to get a drivers license? what is social security? by your definition, any non-anarchic economy is socialist.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    R.I.P. T-MOS
    Posts
    4,944
    Quote Originally Posted by JiGGaMaN View Post
    who builds roads? where do you go to get a drivers license? what is social security? by your definition, any non-anarchic economy is socialist.
    let me clarify, when gov gets involved in the economy, you have a socialist nation...

    road and such are always things done by the gov, whether socialist or not..

    that's an ambiguous statement...

    better yet, i consider it a red hairing, associative fallacy...

    people can rationalize alot..

    im a philosophy major, this is what we do all day, discuss shit like this..

    there has to be some form of socialism in our government.. you can call us the "capitalistic-socialist" nation... like we were bi and confused about it..

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by jamyjamjr View Post
    let me clarify, when gov gets involved in the economy, you have a socialist nation...

    road and such are always things done by the gov, whether socialist or not..

    that's an ambiguous statement...

    better yet, i consider it a red hairing, associative fallacy...

    people can rationalize alot..

    im a philosophy major, this is what we do all day, discuss shit like this..

    there has to be some form of socialism in our government.. you can call us the "capitalistic-socialist" nation... like we were bi and confused about it..
    thats funny you suggest my statement is ambiguous when in fact your is the ambiguous one. also, you spelled herring terribly wrong...

    what you are trying to say: when the government takes ownership of publicly/privately owned companies, that is socialism. was that so hard?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •