CA Supreme Court upholds gay marriage ban

[SMCengineer]

Good, **** the malfunctioning people.

As much as you're opposed to gay marriage, for whatever reason, you should be much more opposed to government dictating who you can and can't enter into a private contract with. And even more opposed to the government assuming authority of licensure over marriage in general. As if you need to ask permission from the state. What an absurd notion.

[Tock]

As much as you're opposed to gay marriage, for whatever reason, you should be much more opposed to government dictating who you can and can't enter into a private contract with. And even more opposed to the government assuming authority of licensure over marriage in general. As if you need to ask permission from the state. What an absurd notion.

100% correct.

The only thing that's more absurd is the government using a religious ritual (church marriage) to establish a person's status before a government agency.

IMHO, it really would be best to leave religious marriage to churches, and then recognize
civil unions as voluntary contracts between people. And when babies are created, then the parents are obliged to look after the child's needs. Any parents not trying to meet their obligation should be arrested and sent to the county workhouse.

[Panzerfaust]

As much as you're opposed to gay marriage, for whatever reason, you should be much more opposed to government dictating who you can and can't enter into a private contract with. And even more opposed to the government assuming authority of licensure over marriage in general. As if you need to ask permission from the state. What an absurd notion.

Oh, I agree with that for sure. I'd leave that to the religious sector.

[SMCengineer]

Oh, I agree with that for sure. I'd leave that to the religious sector.

Right, so than you can't, in any logical or moral sense, agree with the state for asserting it's usurped right to uphold a gay marriage "ban." It's inconsistent even for the most ardent opponent of gay marriage.

[Panzerfaust]

Right, so than you can't, in any logical or moral sense, agree with the state for asserting it's usurped right to uphold a gay marriage "ban." It's inconsistent even for the most ardent opponent of gay marriage.

Yeah, I guess you are right but the whole idea is stupid and makes absolutely no sense. Being gay serves no purpose to mankind, it is a malfunction, nothing more nothing less.

They are gay yet there is almost always a masculine and a femine partner. lol

Makes as much sense as Elton John looking at a Hustler.

[DSM4Life]

Yeah, I guess you are right but the whole idea is stupid and makes absolutely no sense. Being gay serves no purpose to mankind, it is a malfunction, nothing more nothing less.

They are gay yet there is almost always a masculine and a femine partner. lol

Makes as much sense as Elton John looking at a Hustler.

And you hetero's have done such a good job for mankind

Keep up the good work.