That will take some of the fun out of this.Originally Posted by Kratos
the hole in the ground is way cheaper[/QUOTE]
Cheaper, yes.
A good solution, no.
Squirriling a bunch of shit down a hole waiting for it to go away isn't a great prospect. They have no way of knowing what a couple of hundred years is going to actually do to one of those casks.
I think that when Ward, June, and the Beaver were coming up with this energy source they should have limited it to small scale reactors for Navy use or at least applied some foresight to the waste that the grandkids are going to have to deal with before setting sail, full steam ahead.
As for what I think we should do:
I know that my voice doesn't carry far enough to matter. And since there arn't many options, I guess we'll shove it in the mountain after Obama gets out of office and the new guy can redirect the funding back to project completion. This project halt will quickly be overlooked until after Obama is out of office. And then HAVE to be addressed by another Pres. down the road as it will become critical at some point.
Much like the middle east during the Clinton admin.
Reply With Quote