if you had to choose between the two

[alpmaster]

How about you all read the rules topic where it clearly states that there will be no naming of UGLs, not major legitimate pharmaceutical companies, and then we can stay on topic.

[c-Z]

How about you all read the rules topic where it clearly states that there will be no naming of UGLs, not major legitimate pharmaceutical companies, and then we can stay on topic.

Bro. Back your knowledge with information. we can all read.

8. There is to be no naming of UGL labs or sources, this includes the initials of those labs or showing pictures with lab names or web addresses. This is for the protection of both the labs and the board. There have also been many attempts to describe a lab without naming it, this also is not permissible. There will be no discussion of labs or sources tolerated.

I personally would like to hear a vets response to all this though. They can explain the rule more in detail then you can because your thought on it simply means nothing.

[*El Diablo*]

Bro. Back your knowledge with information. we can all read.

8. There is to be no naming of UGL labs or sources, this includes the initials of those labs or showing pictures with lab names or web addresses. This is for the protection of both the labs and the board. There have also been many attempts to describe a lab without naming it, this also is not permissible. There will be no discussion of labs or sources tolerated.

I personally would like to hear a vets response to all this though. They can explain the rule more in detail then you can because your thought on it simply means nothing.

Thank you very much, NO names to be mentioned on the board.

[*El Diablo*]

How about you all read the rules topic where it clearly states that there will be no naming of UGLs, not major legitimate pharmaceutical companies, and then we can stay on topic.

...... the OP was reffering to a major legitimate company mate, UG or not.