Equipose only as a first cycle (not mine)

[*El Diablo*]

^^^ I wanted to add that spooledup would comment very soon, in my previous post.... lol

[Critical Mass]

Given the mild nature of boldenone, one should not expect dramatic gains. One may compare the gains from boldenone to that of methenolone (primobolan) for example, in that the gains are slow and steady, however generally quite retainable post-cycle. As there is little aromatisation, little water weight will be put on, so many may be disheartened at the beginning of a cycle when compared to an AS such as testosterone.

This is what I meant. I am sure that the eq cycle is different from a primo cycle in many ways.

[sp00ledup]

We really aren't supposed to post links to other forums. In any event I personally don't care for EQ and I definitely don't see the comparison between EQ and primo. Now I'll wait for spooledup to come post how fantastic EQ is.

^^^ I wanted to add that spooledup would comment very soon, in my previous post.... lol

What's wrong with saying that I like it and telling people about the good results I have gotten using it?

Once again (and I don't know why this is so difficult to understand), but just because you don't get anything from a particular AAS does not mean that everyone will have the same experience. There are a lot of documented cases on this board where people like the results they get with EQ. I had great results with it.

And the reason I'm responding so late is because my account was apparently suspended. It looks like someone went and cried to the admins that I was challenging their stance on eq and had it done. Weak.

The person just can't handle the fact that he is incorrect about EQ being worthless to people.

[Big]

What's wrong with saying that I like it and telling people about the good results I have gotten using it?

Once again (and I don't know why this is so difficult to understand), but just because you don't get anything from a particular AAS does not mean that everyone with have the same experience. There are a lot of documented cases on this board where people like the results they get with EQ. I had great results with it.

And the reason I'm responding so late is because my account was apparently suspended. It looks like someone went and cried to the admins that I was challenging their stance on eq and had it done. Weak.

my response was joking, I had no idea you were suspended. if you review my past posts on EQ, I typically state that although i don't care for it many others do, and it's a matter of finding out what works best for you.

[sp00ledup]

That is a fair position that I can respect.

But, implying that it's useless to everyone and making comments like "I wouldn't oil my bicycle chain with it", or, "it's worthless", are unfair.

There are people that could potentially benefit from the compound that are being strongly detered from using it.

[Big]

That is a fair position that I can respect.

But, implying that it's useless to everyone and making comments like "I wouldn't oil my bicycle chain with it", or, "it's worthless", are unfair.

There are people that could potentially benefit from the compound that are being strongly detered from using it.

check my response in his previous thread:
http://forums.steroid.com/showthread.php?t=406449

[sp00ledup]

check my response in his previous thread:
http://forums.steroid.com/showthread.php?t=406449

I like your response very much. Very open-minded and open-ended. Notice how the typical people are bashing him all over the place?

He is doing the same cycle as my first except mine went 14 weeks and I started at 600mg/wk (but my blood pressure went too high so I went to 400mg/wk). It more than satisfied my goals of a first cycle.

I do understand that my gains of 17lbs and dropping a waist are not very typical, even my source said he hadn't seen someone do that well with EQ.

This board is way too strict on staying uniform to one cookie cutter set of ideals. I'll have you all know that many other boards support use of none test cycles such as this, do you think I just came up with this cycle all on my own? Just because this boards attitude against mild compound cycles is jaded, none of you speaking from personal experience, doesn't mean you all have to flame me for trying something new.

I want a mild compound with mild sides and mild increase from natural gains, that's eq, that's going to fit my lifestyle and short term goals. Unless you have actually tried it you can shut your mouths and save the "I told you so's" for after pct.

I can relate to this quote.

Also, you have to look closely at someones goals prior to advocating their first cycle. Just to ask for stats and say "Test 500mg/wk for 12 weeks" is not always the correct approach. Not everyone wants to get as absolutely big as possible with dbol and test.