Apollo 20

[higherdesire]

Actually, there should be evidence we went!

so the lack of evidence is the anecdotal evidence that we did not? Fair enough. What was the point of the hoax then? Since there is no benefit for the hoax, or the lack of benefit, does that mean we went? Using, of course, the same theorem.

Who are you talking to exactly?

does that help bro? I mean if there is an argument that we didn't go because there is no evidence we went then how do we have a) a cover up operation b) read my quoted post. I may be dense here though and missing the point?

[BJJ]

u think it was not true, that we didnt go to the moon?

What is the evidence we didnt?

Actually, there should be evidence we went!

does that help bro? I mean if there is an argument that we didn't go because there is no evidence we went then how do we have a) a cover up operation b) read my quoted post. I may be dense here though and missing the point?

As you can see my sentence "there should be evidence we went!" was a direct reply to marcus who wrote "What is the evidence we didnt?" but he was referring to the man on the Moon and not to the Apollo 20 mission.
All of this misunderstanding happened from the sentence of Mooseman "u think it was not true, that we didnt go to the moon?"
I was speaking only about Apollo 20, the man on the Moon for me is not a big deal.

So, assuming I understood the meaning of your first and last reply, they made sense for the thread but needed not to be directed toward me because I am the first one who does not believe in that mission.

Does that help bro?