Question about using GH with a different approach

[Hazard]

Also..... there is a surgery they can do to "release" an extra inch or so..... GH is expensive and the idea is dumb. Why not just save for the surgery and doit..... ?

~Haz~

[init]

Also..... there is a surgery they can do to "release" an extra inch or so..... GH is expensive and the idea is dumb. Why not just save for the surgery and doit..... ?

~Haz~

I read some reviews for that type of surgery where the ligament is cut and there seems to be too high of a percentage of them not happy with the results, there is a lot of guys that regret getting the surgery, of course gh is not a localized hormone, but if someone used Viagra ect to keep an erection that should keep a lot of the gh localized for a few hours, and it seems that that would keep the gh in the whole area where needed using V ect but if someone put something on the base to close the blood flow then the gh would only be in the front portion and not in the 1 to 3 inches of the dick that is behind it on the inside

Another thing is it seems that doing this would not require much gh because it would not leave the dick as the blood doesn't until the erection stops

I know that this is kinda different but it seems to me that this might work