Looking for criticism for my cycle...

[marcus300]

I don't like it, even when you use mild AAS if they are ran long enough they will shut you down and primo on its own wont do anything IMHO, your better off running a low dose test.

[Vitruvian-Man]

I don't like it, even when you use mild AAS if they are ran long enough they will shut you down and primo on its own wont do anything IMHO, your better off running a low dose test.

Actually I'm not sure how much truth there is in that. I'm not sure if you recall, but I remember reading a thread on here from years ago where the OP took EQ only for 12 weeks, and when he got his bloodwork done on the 8th week his HPTA was barely suppressed.

I'm obviously not saying that the gains are going to be profound, but for someone who is VERY concerned about recovering post cycle / if it's difficult for them to recover, then primo/EQ/anavar/T-bol only cycles can definitely be an option.

-VM

[c-Z]

Actually I'm not sure how much truth there is in that. I'm not sure if you recall, but I remember reading a thread on here from years ago where the OP took EQ only for 12 weeks, and when he got his bloodwork done on the 8th week his HPTA was barely suppressed.

I'm obviously not saying that the gains are going to be profound, but for someone who is VERY concerned about recovering post cycle / if it's difficult for them to recover, then primo/EQ/anavar/T-bol only cycles can definitely be an option.

-VM

I look at it like this... You get way you pay for basically. In that aspect. Basically even if it does shut you down barely. Your results will be just that. Barely. So really with that being said... Why even cycle with something so mild. If I am going to use steroids. And admit to not being natural. At least let me be on something worth taking where I don't look like someone who is natural.

[Vitruvian-Man]

Like ive already stated, if you run a drug what is mild on your HPTA long enough it will shut you down, I am not really interested in one guy on here years ago, i know this for a fact from many guys ive worked with and my own experience.

You never even define what "long enough" is though?

I know a friend that has run EQ for 8 months straight, while "on" and "off" cycle. But I'm not going to sit here drawing from personal experiences.

Blood-work doesn't lie . (given it is individual though.)

Personally I wouldnt recommend eq to anyone except if they are oiling a squeaking door, but I do understand some people like it thats fair enough but I think its worthless at building tissue.

Different strokes for different folks.

If the OP is concerned about recovery I would advice a shorter cycle than 12 weeks, more like 6 weeks with mild AAS would be a better option but the cycle he stated is rubbish IMHO.

Running testosterone (even at a low dosage) will shut down your HPTA within a matter of weeks. Indefinitely within, 6. You need to stop and look at it from the opposite perspective: recovering one's natural testosterone production is quite a bit easier when it's JUST suppressed rather then completely shutdown.

Just because you consider it "rubbish" doesn't necessarily mean it won't provide the OP with the gains he was looking for.

Comments in bold.

I look at it like this... You get way you pay for basically. In that aspect. Basically even if it does shut you down barely. Your results will be just that. Barely. So really with that being said... Why even cycle with something so mild. If I am going to use steroids. And admit to not being natural. At least let me be on something worth taking where I don't look like someone who is natural.

Gains are different for each individual using AAS. There are a multitude of reasons why one wouldn't want to "look" or gain mass like a "juicer"... Cycles are completely unique to the user. If someone is looking for moderate gains, with little to minimal HPTA suppression then a mild-AAS may be a good option to consider.

-VM

[marcus300]

Actually I'm not sure how much truth there is in that. I'm not sure if you recall, but I remember reading a thread on here from years ago where the OP took EQ only for 12 weeks, and when he got his bloodwork done on the 8th week his HPTA was barely suppressed.

I'm obviously not saying that the gains are going to be profound, but for someone who is VERY concerned about recovering post cycle / if it's difficult for them to recover, then primo/EQ/anavar/T-bol only cycles can definitely be an option.

-VM

Like ive already stated, if you run a drug what is mild on your HPTA long enough it will shut you down, I am not really interested in one guy on here years ago, i know this for a fact from many guys ive worked with and my own experience.

Personally I wouldnt recommend eq to anyone except if they are oiling a squeaking door, but I do understand some people like it thats fair enough but I think its worthless at building tissue.

If the OP is concerned about recovery I would advice a shorter cycle than 12 weeks, more like 6 weeks with mild AAS would be a better option but the cycle he stated is rubbish IMHO.