
Originally Posted by
baseline_9
However you dont see many people saying "dont run that 19nor, run mast instead"
the experienced guys would say run that 19nor AND mast for the triple stack test/19nor/DHT
Why dont i ever see people reccomending HGH even tho all of you guys would be confident in sticking with it year round.
its just preference, some worry about the enlarged organs from prolonged usage, but the dose to reach that state is uncertain. Its what your goals are. A lot of people dont need to use GH until they have hit a plateau with anabolics. Kind of like how you hit a genetic plateau, when you hit one with anabolics, some jump to adding GH and break through.
I understand that cost is an issue but you do get what you pay for (usually LOL) so why arnt i seeing more vets/hofs reccomending better (asuming also safer) compounds?
"Safer" is a relative statement, when used properly, not many compounds are overly dangerous.