220lbs means absolutely squat when you don't mention any height whatsoever. 220 at 6'6 for example is pathetic, but for 5'10, it's god-like assuming it's muscle
220lbs means absolutely squat when you don't mention any height whatsoever. 220 at 6'6 for example is pathetic, but for 5'10, it's god-like assuming it's muscle
EXACTLY!
I'm 6'1" 245lbs and my friend is 5'7" 215lbs yet he looks WAAAYYYYYYYYYYY more muscular than me. Look at the under 202lbs division in bodybuilding. Those guys are short but look ridiculous at 200lbs.
220lbs is a fair number for anyone over 6' IMO..... if you can't get to 220 on just test at 6'..... you're doing something wrong.
~Haz~
F*ck if you can't get to 220lb at 5'8" with just test that's pathetic. 220 was just a number....no shit it won't mean anything if someone is 6'6". Problem is, not many people are 6'6" thus the reason I said 220lbs because 95% of them are between 5'8" - 6'0" which is a solid weight at that height range. ONLY reason I through out 220lb. Of course there will be individual variables to how youd have to look to be huge, but 220lbs for the average height these day (assuming it's muscle) is a pretty good base.
wrong thread
Last edited by AlphaMaleDawg; 09-26-2010 at 04:31 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)