I actually went ahead and read it anyway a few hours ago. It was a bit different than the one I was thinking of.
But isn't it very possible that the findings in these studies he cites were skewed because of the infrequency of the shots? It seems that they are just based on what an individual shot of test will do (or multiple infrequent shots that allow for a return to baseline in between), and not a steady level like we would have in a cycle with frequent injections. I only took the time to look up the monkey study (source #2), but the shortest ester used was Enanthate, which doesn't really tell us much about Prop vs Enanthate. I'm still far from convinced, as it still just seems like a lot of conjecture, since he can't really provide a scientific basis for these findings.
Whatever, maybe I'm just being cranky and contrary because its midnight here and I have to teach a class in 8 hrs, but I'm awaiting your thoughts on the matter (and not trying to pick a fight with you that I'll surely lose) lol.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)