Originally Posted by
GH consumer
That is like saying how can anything good come out of a company that is not western.
There are some bigger and better companies present in Asia then in the west. Example: China just bought 600 airplanes worth of 32 bilion dollars. Something EU or the USA can not do in 7-10 years.
The knowledge and economical power are present outside of western countries.
Knowledge is not in hands of only big powerfull western companies.
Their marketing tells you that it is (to keep you misinformed and their customer) but logically it is obvious it is not. Not all knowledge is in our hands.
We cannot deny there are people and companies able to make good GH outside of the western world.
Indian, Chinese and other Asian scientists with just as good degrees and knowledge that are not working for western company.
As to the question why these facilities have no approval, well, it is not hard to see competition in any field and also in this Gh arena. ANy new company presents a danger to the market and must be kept out to protect own market. For reference see many many quality products coming out of non-western countries and being denied acces to our markets.
If they are so bad then why deny them acces...?
Therefore we must at least assume and leave it open to testing that a generic can be worth out money.
If all generics are a bust how can we account for some peoples results that have tested their IGF-1 while using generics and it has been elevated much more than naturally possible?
And the countless people that have said they have excellent results and all the typical good and bad effects of good GH?
Yes pharm grade is good and yes some generics are good.
No point in arguing one way or another.
The case is clear just like in every open market: original=good but pricey, copy=can be bad and can be good.
Choose.
Reply With Quote