text convo i had with a friend on test prop

[yungone501]

^ i disagree.

If both substance are used as suggested, prop does in fact have more stable blood levels. It has a more rapid peak yes but with a reasonable half life it will sustain nicely and give a much smoother blood level. IMO.

As far as gyno, test is test.

Its to my experience (and many others) to have significantly less bloat on prop.

[brolic272]

^ i disagree.

If both substance are used as suggested, prop does in fact have more stable blood levels. It has a more rapid peak yes but with a reasonable half life it will sustain nicely and give a much smoother blood level. IMO.

As far as gyno, test is test.

Its to my experience (and many others) to have significantly less bloat on prop.

thanks for the advice. im running an 8 week test prop cycle in about a year when im 23 and also wanted to know if i should start HCG at week 3-8 at 2x 250iu ew or start it from the beginning weeks 1-8. i was considering letro because i really do not want gyno but i read that it would be overkill considering my cycle so i'd go with arimidex or aromasin. also, does it really make a difference if i pin the prop eod as opposed to ed? if it would really be a benefit to pin ed then i'll do it.

[Swifto]

here's a convo between me and a friend who says he has guided 6 people through their cycles.

me: "i heard test prop has less sides like gyno and bloating"

him: "not true. its a myth...test is test bro. prop just gives you more stable blood levels...if u fuk up a dose with prop u actually have a higher chance of gyno"

is there any truth to this?

Test prop causes less of a rise in estrogen and DHT at the same dose, but is more anabolic per 100mg because of the ester weight.

^ i disagree.

If both substance are used as suggested, prop does in fact have more stable blood levels. It has a more rapid peak yes but with a reasonable half life it will sustain nicely and give a much smoother blood level. IMO.

As far as gyno, test is test.

Its to my experience (and many others) to have significantly less bloat on prop.

Test is not Test. From the studies I have seen, the ester can determine the rate of conversion to both estrogen and DHT.

If you want the most stable blood plasma concentrations possible, injecting a long ester ED or EOD is how you do it.

thanks for the advice. im running an 8 week test prop cycle in about a year when im 23 and also wanted to know if i should start HCG at week 3-8 at 2x 250iu ew or start it from the beginning weeks 1-8. i was considering letro because i really do not want gyno but i read that it would be overkill considering my cycle so i'd go with arimidex or aromasin. also, does it really make a difference if i pin the prop eod as opposed to ed? if it would really be a benefit to pin ed then i'll do it.

Letro is overkill.

Aromasin 10mg/ED or EOD is fine.

Start the HCG from week 1 if you have enough, if not week 2-3 is fine.

I use Test Prop EOD and it gives me no more sides/gains, than using it ED. It is, however, best used ED (optimal).

[stevey_6t9]

Test is not Test. From the studies I have seen, the ester can determine the rate of conversion to both estrogen and DHT.

can u post the study bro.

[Swifto]

can u post the study bro.

All though this is mostly theory, I think the idea's hold merit.

http://forums.steroid.com/showthread...icle-on-Esters...

I for one, hold far more water on long ester's and find it harder to control both estrogen and acne. Gains in mass are easier with long ester's than short in my experience too at the same dose. Which all co-oberate with Anthony's theory's and the studies shown in the article.