lol, no. im not trying any angle. if i wanted advice for cycle then i wuld just come out and ask 4 it. i know plenty of guys in my gym who cycle, i have no problewm geting roids but im not an idiot. im only 18 and 174 ibs! been told not to plenty of times before. i guess ill ask wen i think i am ready 2 cycle then :P but is 200ibs a good goal for natty?
200 would be a decent base if he was 6 feet tall or so, but he's 6'3. One can estimate that between two men, one at 5'10 and one at 6'0, each with equal percentages of lean mass etc. there should be about a 20 pound weight difference between the two. So 200 pounds at 6'3 would appear similar to a 5'11 man who weighs 160. Very small. I think for someone of that height a weight of 220 could easily be reached naturally.
For others to better critique, it might be best to post a few pics. That way we all get an idea of your structure. You could have two 6' 200 men standing right beside each other and look completely different...even with the same bf%. Bone structure has alot to do with 'what looks good'. Im about 5'8" but have really small bones so appear to have much more muscularity then others of my stats, you know?
ye i get u on the bone structure. ill see what i can do about the pics! get my girl 2 take them lol. the best i can do 4 u atm is 16" arms, 46" chest 32" waist, 20" thighs, 14" calves (my legs and calves r worst body parts, they really get to me!)
give me a day or two 2 get pics, im doing exams atm.
You really shouldn't be so hasty to dismiss others thoughts. The ten pounds per inch of height estimation is not my own creation. It is a valid estimate of body weight given height and body composition. Of course there are exceptions given that some people have freakishly long arms or legs in comparison to their torso. However if you actually give it some consideration, it works our pretty well for most people.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)