Question on how big your can get...

[Far from massive]

I think a whole lot of it depends on what your natural genetics predispose you to. What I mean by this is if you take two guys with the same training/diet background and one is 6'2" and 240 at 12% naturally and he bulks up to 260 at 16% off season then drops to 215 at 6% its going to be a lot easier to function by cycling than it is for the guy who is 6'2" and 210 at 12% natural and achieves the same 215 at 6% by AAS. But I could be completly wrong, it just seems that the guy with a huge natural base who mostly just has to shred to compete will be more likely to be able to cycle and achieve his goals than a guy with a average base who needs to both gain mass and shred to compete.

[Tough92]

I think a whole lot of it depends on what your natural genetics predispose you to. What I mean by this is if you take two guys with the same training/diet background and one is 6'2" and 240 at 12% naturally and he bulks up to 260 at 16% off season then drops to 215 at 6% its going to be a lot easier to function by cycling than it is for the guy who is 6'2" and 210 at 12% natural and achieves the same 215 at 6% by AAS. But I could be completly wrong, it just seems that the guy with a huge natural base who mostly just has to shred to compete will be more likely to be able to cycle and achieve his goals than a guy with a average base who needs to both gain mass and shred to compete.

Not sure I understood correctly but your saying it would be better to get a good nateral base first then get on aas?yes that's obvious but what if there is a set time?

Say 2 indiviuals same gentics/training/diet/etc both have say 1 year and a 4 months to compete and get into contest shape by that end time

Who would end up looking better at the end of the year and 4 months?
Person A who hopped on gear after 2months training natty
Person B who hopped on gear after training 6 months natty

Think I changed the whole quedtion around but do u get what I'm asking?

[Eazy20]

Not sure I understood correctly but your saying it would be better to get a good nateral base first then get on aas?yes that's obvious but what if there is a set time?

Say 2 indiviuals same gentics/training/diet/etc both have say 1 year and a 4 months to compete and get into contest shape by that end time

Who would end up looking better at the end of the year and 4 months?
Person A who hopped on gear after 2months training natty
Person B who hopped on gear after training 6 months natty

Think I changed the whole quedtion around but do u get what I'm asking?

That's like saying if I got a 10 second head start in a foot race against my buddy who is equally as fast who would win?

Of course the guy who's been on gear longer would be bigger and stronger if everything was identical, but under no circumstance would that ever be true

[AlphaMaleDawg]

Not sure I understood correctly but your saying it would be better to get a good nateral base first then get on aas?yes that's obvious but what if there is a set time?

Say 2 indiviuals same gentics/training/diet/etc both have say 1 year and a 4 months to compete and get into contest shape by that end time

Who would end up looking better at the end of the year and 4 months?
Person A who hopped on gear after 2months training natty
Person B who hopped on gear after training 6 months natty

Think I changed the whole quedtion around but do u get what I'm asking?

Person A, but no two men are created equally (unless they are twins)