
 Originally Posted by 
jimmyinkedup
					 
				 
				You arent seriously going to base what is most effective off of what ingredients supplement companies are using in their shiney tubs of glory are you ?
FYI - The whole high gi carbs / ala/ creatine theory took off with one of the biggest rip off supps ever - cell -tech. Now i like ala...but becuase im insulin resistant, and not just pwo.
Also old school is honey - which is glucose and fructose. Recent studies indicate this may , in fact, be best.
Fact is I think people have to try and see what works best for them. I personally cannot justify that amount of sugar intake for any reason and any insulin spike caused by ingestion of simple carbs cannot illict an anabolic effect that makes it worth the negative of that high intake of sugars. Thats just my opinion. I personally do best with low gi carbs pwo.
Also of note - once you have reached peak levels of creatine - there will be no diff in perfromance if you take it in water or in glucose or dextrose solution. Thats is a BS myth.
To each his own , but more and more i think its a matter of individual response. I cant see the benfit of rapid glyocogen replenishemnt when it comes with the cost of potential fat gain and detrimental overall health effects of that much sugar. Also considering it offers no increased muscle hyperatrophy ...then why bother? Only place may be prudent is in an endurance scenario or a "2 a day" sports training scenario ,etc.
All just my opinion.