Would i see results?

[MuttonChop]

21
6'2"
240lbs
16% bf
1 cycle under belt. 500mgs Test E with 40mgs Dbol.

Only looking for small reduction in bf% and gaining some good strength. Im at 375lbs on the bench press, 415-420lbs would be nice. Raw of course

Let me be honest here. 16% bf at your weight and height probably means that you are not close to your genetic potential. In that case, you are not going to see much difference in 200mg vs 300mg per week. You are going to grow with both dosages and probably see very minimal differences.

With that in mind, here are a few things for you to consider:

1) How much did you gain on your last cycle, and how much did you retain? If the growth was very large on previous cycle, you should lean toward 200mg/week. You'll save some money and have less liquid to inject.

2) If the Tren is from an UG lab, I can almost guarantee that the dosing will not be correct unless you have had it tested. If it is under dosed, going with 300mg/week will put you on the safe side, and also make up for loss of liquid during pinning.

The best solution I see is to go with Tren A, if you have the choice, to see how your body reacts. This way, you can see immediately how much you grow off of 200mg/week, and then increase as needed. This will give you peace of mind.
I made the mistake of doing Tren E for my first cycle, and it took me 5 weeks to realize that the dose was not enough. If you increase the dose that late, it is bad because you just spent a few weeks spinning your wheels and not going anywhere while still suppressing your natty test.

[dec11]

Let me be honest here. 16% bf at your weight and height probably means that you are not close to your genetic potential. In that case, you are not going to see much difference in 200mg vs 300mg per week. You are going to grow with both dosages and probably see very minimal differences.

With that in mind, here are a few things for you to consider:

1) How much did you gain on your last cycle, and how much did you retain? If the growth was very large on previous cycle, you should lean toward 200mg/week. You'll save some money and have less liquid to inject.why?

2) If the Tren is from an UG lab, I can almost guarantee that the dosing will not be correct unless you have had it tested. If it is under dosed, going with 300mg/week will put you on the safe side, and also make up for loss of liquid during pinning. all tren is UGL

The best solution I see is to go with Tren A, if you have the choice, to see how your body reacts. This way, you can see immediately how much you grow off of 200mg/week, and then increase as needed. This will give you peace of mind.
I made the mistake of doing Tren E for my first cycle, and it took me 5 weeks to realize that the dose was not enough. If you increase the dose that late, it is bad because you just spent a few weeks spinning your wheels and not going anywhere while still suppressing your natty test.

right im not trying to flame or cause an argument, but this needs to read by the people you are offering your 'experiences' to.

you came here in March looking for advice on a test e cycle, having started BB'ing the year before. after thanking a vet for his advice not to go ahead, you then decided you were waiting afew years.
http://forums.steroid.com/showthread...t=#post5559435
now all of a sudden you've done three cycles and the first one having been tren e. so that is three cycles in seven months if we are to believe you?
http://forums.steroid.com/showthread...t=#post5800957

so what is the truth Muttonchop? there are many holes in your story from education to AAS usage. i really think you shouldn't be offering advice to anyone on here if you've no experience yourself.

[Bigd89]

Let me be honest here. 16% bf at your weight and height probably means that you are not close to your genetic potential. In that case, you are not going to see much difference in 200mg vs 300mg per week. You are going to grow with both dosages and probably see very minimal differences.

With that in mind, here are a few things for you to consider:

1) How much did you gain on your last cycle, and how much did you retain? If the growth was very large on previous cycle, you should lean toward 200mg/week. You'll save some money and have less liquid to inject.

2) If the Tren is from an UG lab, I can almost guarantee that the dosing will not be correct unless you have had it tested. If it is under dosed, going with 300mg/week will put you on the safe side, and also make up for loss of liquid during pinning.

The best solution I see is to go with Tren A, if you have the choice, to see how your body reacts. This way, you can see immediately how much you grow off of 200mg/week, and then increase as needed. This will give you peace of mind.
I made the mistake of doing Tren E for my first cycle, and it took me 5 weeks to realize that the dose was not enough. If you increase the dose that late, it is bad because you just spent a few weeks spinning your wheels and not going anywhere while still suppressing your natty test.

I gained roughly 22 lbs and kept it all. I've also gotten much stronger since my first cycle too. I'm not worried about the Tren I have because I trust my source 100%.

I'm gunna go ahead and just stick 400mgs, and keep my Test at 250mgs.

And you right, I know I havent completely reached my genetic limit..hell I dont think everybody ever really reaches it...
I'm 'bulking' up to 265-275lbs, then go on a cut. As long as I dont get over 17% bf...I really don't care. I'm going after the mass and super strength.