
Originally Posted by
JD250
Hindsight is always 20/20.......it's easy to look back at all the facts once they are compiled and sit in judgement, I actually read what the Grand jury wrote, EVERY page of it, they found Joe Pa to be the only credible witness in this whole debaucle, he wasn't found guilty of any crime, that's how the justice system works, it protects us from people who would crucify EVERYONE because their emotions told them who deserves to be punished. Maybe Joe Pa was clueless about the evils that were taking place, but to condemn him for something he's not guilty of is ludicrous, and to crucify him for being a clueless old man is unacceptable, he lost everything he ever had in life because he was clueless.......that's enough punishment. I suppose some would like to spit on his grave but that would just be misguided rage and emotions. In my mind there were only 2 guilty people in this whole thing, Mcqueary and Sandusky.