Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Sides on shorter esters worse?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Back from Afghanistan
    Posts
    27,376
    this is the counter argument, that benefits on shorter esthers are better?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,016
    Quote Originally Posted by Times Roman View Post
    this is the counter argument, that benefits on shorter esthers are better?
    lol whaaaaat?

    if the original argument is "shorter acting ester's produce worse sides than longer acting esters" I beleive the counter argument to that is "shorter esters produce sides that are no worse, or equal to longer acting esters".

    sorry I don't understand your post times, maybe I am a little out of it today.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •