this is the counter argument, that benefits on shorter esthers are better?
this is the counter argument, that benefits on shorter esthers are better?
lol whaaaaat?
if the original argument is "shorter acting ester's produce worse sides than longer acting esters" I beleive the counter argument to that is "shorter esters produce sides that are no worse, or equal to longer acting esters".
sorry I don't understand your post times, maybe I am a little out of it today.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)