
Originally Posted by
Vettester
See, this is the stuff that gets frustrating. Every time someone wants to hold Mr. Obama accountable for his promises on "our" economy, the best it seems anyone can do is start looking at how rich Romney is. Damn that rich guy, he needs to pay his fair share!! And so when the Federal Government imposes that he gets that up to 25%, guess what, he will just forgo on the $4 million that he gives to charity. Sorry Gixx, I just don't believe in the redistribution model, and trying to witch hunt the rich in some class warfare scheme. We agree to disagree ...
Maybe adjustments can be made on these so called 2%er's, I dunno, but why won't any of you guys at least say he did the exact opposite of what he promised? People elected him on this "Hope and Change" of how he articulated himself, and that how our country would be such a different place when he got the job. He's the most divisive president ever! Like I said, Hillary would have been much better, just for the fact that I think her husband would have counseled her on how to pull to the middle when needed.