Second Cycle........NEED YOUR ATTENTION PLZZZZZ

[mmgearworks]

Fair enough lunk...

AI essential considering the dosing? More issues than good in my eyes, keep on hand? Yea sure but not a set rule to start any cycle which seems to be the trend here lately? Opinions will be opinions. PCT being the most wide open for discussion. I work from knowledge of personally handling clients bloods and experimenting on various protocols. So yea personal view "better" than mine accepted but not proven. Lunk where we can agree is your view on the OP's approach! I have your back their fully and am in full agreement. My view in instances like this (with and OP in this attitude vein) is to deliver some type of usable base that will yield successful results and recovery in a safe way based on tried and tested practice. As opposed to saying **** you go and read which they won't do, they will get scared of and will jump on cycle anyway.
I did not include EQ I took it from the OP's initial cycle in the hope that he had researched a compound he wanted to use and included it as such.

[Capebuffalo]

Fair enough lunk...

AI essential considering the dosing? More issues than good in my eyes, keep on hand? Yea sure but not a set rule to start any cycle which seems to be the trend here lately? Opinions will be opinions. PCT being the most wide open for discussion. I work from knowledge of personally handling clients bloods and experimenting on various protocols. So yea personal view "better" than mine accepted but not proven. Lunk where we can agree is your view on the OP's approach! I have your back their fully and am in full agreement. My view in instances like this (with and OP in this attitude vein) is to deliver some type of usable base that will yield successful results and recovery in a safe way based on tried and tested practice. As opposed to saying **** you go and read which they won't do, they will get scared of and will jump on cycle anyway.
I did not include EQ I took it from the OP's initial cycle in the hope that he had researched a compound he wanted to use and included it as such.

I am all for advise. But myself if someone says take this. I will ask why what does it do? Or will look it up so I have knowledge of compounds I am putting into my body. It is called personal responsibility. If something goes wrong, it is now your fault because "I did what he told me to do". If he can ask knowledgeable questions so I know he understands what is going on thats one thing. This is something else

[Lunk1]

Fair enough lunk...

AI essential considering the dosing? More issues than good in my eyes, keep on hand? Yea sure but not a set rule to start any cycle which seems to be the trend here lately? Opinions will be opinions. PCT being the most wide open for discussion. I work from knowledge of personally handling clients bloods and experimenting on various protocols. So yea personal view "better" than mine accepted but not proven. Lunk where we can agree is your view on the OP's approach! I have your back their fully and am in full agreement. My view in instances like this (with and OP in this attitude vein) is to deliver some type of usable base that will yield successful results and recovery in a safe way based on tried and tested practice. As opposed to saying **** you go and read which they won't do, they will get scared of and will jump on cycle anyway.
I did not include EQ I took it from the OP's initial cycle in the hope that he had researched a compound he wanted to use and included it as such.

I understand your approach (understand isn't ageeing with). I would never consider just tossing the OP out on his aas if he didn't understand the informative threads. I think it's important to establish a relationship of sorts with these newbs and to gather all of the facts and give the BEST advise based on the info. Establishing a more personaly tailored cycle vs just correcting their proposed cycle and saying "there ya go have fun"!

In this case for example, since the op has NO real cycle experience, I believe a solid Test only cycle would have been best. I doubt the op will need or see any benifits from EQ but now he is fixed on using it and doesn't know why. Equally (perhaps even more important) would be determining the ops goals and figuring out what can be done to achieve said goals OTHER than just AAS. Perhaps a diet change is in order?

Very few members I have seen (including Cape) have a habit of telling OP's to FUK off! Quite the opposite acctually. They try to break down the problems, tailor the needs for the op and give sound advise based in the info recieved.

Again...I have read a bit and believe your knowledge to be sound but with respect I question if your approach is in the best interest of the individuals posting for advise.