Parsa...let me ask you some questions.
What are your goals during this cycle (what are your expectations)?
What has led you to choose EQ for a compound to run with Test?
Any logical reason you would not run another test only cycle?
What were your results from that first cycle?
Parsa...since 80-90% of success with your cycle is based on diet, this is more important than you think. I would venture to guess that this may be a reason that your first Test cycle was not very successful. I REALLY believe that we should concentrate on a SOLID test only cycle with a solid diet. Your EQ will not yield any real results other than perhaps in increase in hunger and an increase in your RBC count.
EQ vs Test only (same results but less $ spent and risks taken with test only)
Believe me! I had a very tough diet and very hard days of rocking in the gym! I'm not gonna take risk again; the risk of having no result! that's why i insist on stacking.
You say that EQ is no good... so what is your suggestion? for quality muscle mass without water retention?
Actually I didnt get a satisfactory result out of a test only cycle so adding a mild compound which has satisfactory results with least side effects came to be part of my plan. And through my searchings i could find EQ the best choice for making lean muscle. Isn't it better than Deca?
The problem was that using it for 8 weeks is waste of time. So i decided to continue using it for 12 weeks.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)