Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: keep bouncing around for what I need to add to my test cycle. A little help please.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    Quote Originally Posted by Sworder View Post
    HCG helps keep your leydig cells from atrophying. Leydig cells in your gonads are responsible for testosterone production so once PCT comes around you want them to be ready to produce testosterone once the signal is sent from your pituitary. If you want you can pin the hCG IM in the same syringe as your testosterone. The only thing is the measurement isn't going to be as accurate had you been using a slin pin. Nonetheless I would rather pin the hCG IM than not at all. Get the hCG, include it and run it. Recover quicker and enjoy your gains.
    Sworder...I am kind of shocked that you are such a strong advocate of HCG....interesting!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,196
    Quote Originally Posted by Lunk1 View Post
    Sworder...I am kind of shocked that you are such a strong advocate of HCG....interesting!
    It's the cellular atrophy that is my main concern. Had you been able to keep the pituitary from cellular atrophy imagine how quickly you would be able to recover in PCT! This is the reason why longer cycles are more detrimental, because the cells are atrophying more and more. HCG is a great tool that is affordable and works very well.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    Quote Originally Posted by Sworder View Post
    It's the cellular atrophy that is my main concern. Had you been able to keep the pituitary from cellular atrophy imagine how quickly you would be able to recover in PCT! This is the reason why longer cycles are more detrimental, because the cells are atrophying more and more. HCG is a great tool that is affordable and works very well.
    Would it matter if you are not prone to test atrophy???

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,196
    Nope, it wouldn't matter. The cosmetic appeal is irrelevant. The cells are so tiny you would need a microscope to see them of course. Testicular volume does not correlate function! Obviously it does in some cases, if they would be the size of peas. For cyclers, it isn't a good way to determine the function. I gotta sleep now, have a good night.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    Quote Originally Posted by Sworder View Post
    Nope, it wouldn't matter. The cosmetic appeal is irrelevant. The cells are so tiny you would need a microscope to see them of course. Testicular volume does not correlate function! Obviously it does in some cases, if they would be the size of peas. For cyclers, it isn't a good way to determine the function. I gotta sleep now, have a good night.
    I assumed the same when I asked but thanks..G'night

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •