Question about aspirating

[Steelfan]

fair enough. I just know what I have been trained and why. I did a quick search and the main reason that aspiration in the deltiod has been removed as a step in some training books/videos is because it causes the injection to be "slightly more painful and last a few seconds longer." In my opinion that is a silly reason to remove a safety step. My point is this you could inject yourself 100,000 times without a problem and on the 100,001st time accidently inject directly into the vein. why take a risk for such a small step? Aspirating takes a second tops, and doesn't hurt so why not do it even in the delt? Not try to be a dick here but I can't seem to find an argument against aspiration that makes sense.

[Sworder]

fair enough. I just know what I have been trained and why. I did a quick search and the main reason that aspiration in the deltiod has been removed as a step in some training books/videos is because it causes the injection to be "slightly more painful and last a few seconds longer." In my opinion that is a silly reason to remove a safety step. My point is this you could inject yourself 100,000 times without a problem and on the 100,001st time accidently inject directly into the vein. why take a risk for such a small step? Aspirating takes a second tops, and doesn't hurt so why not do it even in the delt? Not try to be a dick here but I can't seem to find an argument against aspiration that makes sense.

You know how some people are ambidextrous? What if the person in question doesn't know how to use EITHER hand proficiently? Wouldn't that be a just cause that may warrant the notion to perhaps skip aspirating?

[Lunk1]

You know how some people are ambidextrous? What if the person in question doesn't know how to use EITHER hand proficiently? Wouldn't that be a just cause that may warrant the notion to perhaps skip aspirating?

I would say if a person can't use either hand then I would think AAS use in general would be pointless