prohormone cycle - feedback request!

[Lunk1]

While some may disagree my opinion is that you should throw all of that shyt in the garbage. I havn't seen a good prohormone in over 5 years. I used to use alot of them myself but even the ones that contained a steroidal product were so low dosed that it would take 5X the required dose to have any real effect. This was a great strain on the liver and kidneys, not to mention the starin on the wallet.

Just not worth it imo.

[mtb1981]

While some may disagree my opinion is that you should throw all of that shyt in the garbage. I havn't seen a good prohormone in over 5 years. I used to use alot of them myself but even the ones that contained a steroidal product were so low dosed that it would take 5X the required dose to have any real effect. This was a great strain on the liver and kidneys, not to mention the starin on the wallet.

Just not worth it imo.

Seriously. Why prohormones? They are not healthy, and I would even say they are way worst for you than a real cycle of AAS. I would get BW done to check lipids and liver enzymes AT LEAST! So not worth it, especially if you have means to healthier alternatives.

Both are potent and active steroids, not prohormones.

Edit - misread the OP. The first cycle is the one I was referring to that are steroids not prohormones.

[triangulo]

Both are potent and active steroids, not prohormones.

prohormones are inactive precursors of actual hormones. they need to be activated by enzymes in the liver. because of that steroidal prohormones are thought to be more harmful than injected hormones, because those are already active and don't lead to as much stress in the liver.

both - prohormones and actual hormones - can also be harmful because they have the potential to dysregulate the well regulated equilibrium of the hormones in your body that are controlled via endogenous feedback loops...

[anahny]

Both are potent and active steroids, not prohormones.

Edit - misread the OP. The first cycle is the one I was referring to that are steroids not prohormones.

Agreed. Both are steroids once in the body. Main reason why they are both banned. Second cycle was a mild prohormones. But first was aas

[triangulo]

Agreed. Both are steroids once in the body. Main reason why they are both banned. Second cycle was a mild prohormones. But first was aas

what do you mean?! ultradrol and trenazone are both steroids? i didn't even realize...i thought they were both prohormones...

ultradrol is not available any more, but trenazone can still be easily purchased on amazon etc.

how can you hold steroids and prohormones apart? is there any way to do so by the chemical structure?

[Buster Brown]

what do you mean?! ultradrol and trenazone are both steroids? i didn't even realize...i thought they were both prohormones...

ultradrol is not available any more, but trenazone can still be easily purchased on amazon etc.

how can you hold steroids and prohormones apart? is there any way to do so by the chemical structure?

They are not considered steroids because at the time of the ban, these products weren't being used. Now there are alot of "prohormones" floating around (DMZ etc.) that were pre-cursors to steroids (created but not marketed years ago) and are inactive on the shelf but need to be ingested to become an active compound. I would think that they would adversly affect your endurance doing your martial arts.

[Abmaster]

Ultra drol is a avaible lmao. strongsupplmentshop.com it's a replacement for SuperDrol since they band that in augest
I think ultradrol is like zero estrogen and still great for bulking not sure on that don't quote me on it haha

[Abmaster]

And you ppl have to realize some of this stuff gets band cause the FDA dea know there's dumb ppl out there will abuse and misuse this cause harm to themselves
And cause of big pharma companies to like the original 1-AD by eurgopharms was like $30 bucks ? Now u have go to a doctor get prescribe for like $100 ???
It comes down to money why some of this stuff gets band