Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: TDEE normally vs TDEE on a TREN cycle

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    No Sources Given
    Posts
    5,408
    Quote Originally Posted by Perseverance1 View Post
    Honestly I think this is just a universal truth for people on cycle, not sure what prompts you to believe that people with a lower bf will react to the drugs differently than people with a higher

    Those with a higher bodyfat/large lean muscle mass will not have a large percentage of their TDEE accounted for by the growth of muscles so their caloric needs will not be affected nearly as much by increased muscle growth on cycle compared to those with low bodyfat/large lean muscle mass.


    %. Granted you shouldn't really start cycling unless you're already at around 12% but that's a whole nother discussion...

    What do you think?
    See Above
    Last edited by Far from massive; 12-02-2012 at 11:31 AM.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Far from massive View Post
    See Above
    I sort of follow what you're saying...but I might be just a tad bit too stupid...you're telling
    me that someone with 16% bf will have a sizable difference in TDEE on a cycle of tren than someone at 12%?

    What makes you believe that people with a higher bf% won't have a large percentage of their TDEE accounted for by the growth of muscles while on cycle? Have you seen anywhere that states AAS affects people with more bf differently than people with less (minus some of the sides)?

    I'm not ribbing you here, just generally curious.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •