Results 1 to 37 of 37

Thread: Adex dosage??

  1. #1

    Adex dosage??

    Hey guys! Running a dbol/ test e cycle and was wondering what people recommend for Adex dose with it. .25mg eod to start and monitor? It is liquid Adex, any thoughts would be great, cheers!

  2. #2
    .25mg/eod is a good starter. Monitor yourself and if your nipples get sensitive go to .25mg/ed until it's gone and then go back to eod. I believe in not over medicating if you don't need to.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    16,515
    Just wondering if you take .25 eod and you get sensitive and you put it up to .25 ed or higher when the sensitive goes away and you drop it back down wont it come back. Should you not stay on the higher dose because that whats right for you Just asking.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200
    Quote Originally Posted by clarky. View Post
    Just wondering if you take .25 eod and you get sensitive and you put it up to .25 ed or higher when the sensitive goes away and you drop it back down wont it come back. Should you not stay on the higher dose because that whats right for you Just asking.
    You can titrate up to .25 ED protocol, or .5 EOD and then monitor. Depending on the individual this may be adjusted a few times during your cycle.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    L.A
    Posts
    24,626
    I would go with .25 eod and adjust from there

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    16,515
    When i was on cycle tren / test i was on 1mg eod i know that is a lot for adex but that was what worked for me.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    13,685
    I would do the .25eod Bro.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200
    Quote Originally Posted by clarky. View Post
    When i was on cycle tren / test i was on 1mg eod i know that is a lot for adex but that was what worked for me.
    It worked with respect to blood work, or how you felt and visual sides? If it was determined through blood work, then continue with 1mg eod. If not then as i suggested before, .25mg eod or ed and titrate up from there. But it sounds as though your are sensitive to E2.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    L.A
    Posts
    24,626
    As usual have to agree with Mick
    Quote Originally Posted by MickeyKnox View Post
    It worked with respect to blood work, or how you felt and visual sides? If it was determined through blood work, then continue with 1mg eod. If not then as i suggested before, .25mg eod or ed and titrate up from there. But it sounds as though your are sensitive to E2.

  10. #10
    JohnnyVegas's Avatar
    JohnnyVegas is offline Knowledgeable Member- Recognized Member Winner - $100
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    The Desert
    Posts
    5,962
    You might want to consider doing blood work after a few weeks to see where your E2 is. I felt fine and had been using .25 ED but discovered my E2 was around 300 (should be 1/10th that) when I had blood work done. Do not go by "feel," go by blood work. It costs $45 at the place I use...totally worth it.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    L.A
    Posts
    24,626
    Yes Yes and Yes To many people do not do proper Labs!
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyVegas View Post
    You might want to consider doing blood work after a few weeks to see where your E2 is. I felt fine and had been using .25 ED but discovered my E2 was around 300 (should be 1/10th that) when I had blood work done. Do not go by "feel," go by blood work. It costs $45 at the place I use...totally worth it.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    16,515
    Hi guys i was not jumping in on 1997s post it was just a ? to scotchgaurd reply and it was just how i felt and visual thanks mickey

  13. #13
    JohnnyVegas's Avatar
    JohnnyVegas is offline Knowledgeable Member- Recognized Member Winner - $100
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    The Desert
    Posts
    5,962
    Quote Originally Posted by clarky. View Post
    When i was on cycle tren / test i was on 1mg eod i know that is a lot for adex but that was what worked for me.
    I have talked to several guys that use .5mg ED (basically the same as you) so I don't think that is out of line at all. Everyone needs to find what works for them. In my case I discovered that what I thought was a solid dose wasn't even close.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Defiling Myself
    Posts
    22,069
    For example I have to run .20 every day. Perfect for me and what I am running.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200
    Im currently running 1ml = 25mg/day Aromasin to maintain E2

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    16,515
    I only ever used adex once i use aromasin now Thats why i asked scotchgaurd if your senstive and you up your ai and that fixed the probs why put it back down.was just trying to help the OP

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by rdre1979 View Post
    Hey guys! Running a dbol/ test e cycle and was wondering what people recommend for Adex dose with it. .25mg eod to start and monitor? It is liquid Adex, any thoughts would be great, cheers!
    How much dbol and how much test? Why has no one asked this yet???

  18. #18
    Haha, all good Clarky!! The cycle is 30mg dbol ed 4 weeks, 500mg test-e / week 12 weeks. PCT nolva 40/40/20/20 + Clomid 100/100/50/50.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    16,515
    No hcg it makes it easier and quicker for your pct recovery. And .25 will probs be ok just adjust as needed and imo i would stay with that dose.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200
    Quote Originally Posted by rdre1979;62***03
    Haha, all good Clarky!! The cycle is 30mg dbol ed 4 weeks, 500mg test-e / week 12 weeks. PCT nolva 40/40/20/20 + Clomid 100/100/50/50.
    No need to double up on the second wks of your PCT.

    hCG on cycle @ 250iu 2/wk day before your test injection will prevent testicular atrophy and assist in a smooth transition from on cycle to PCT.

  21. #21
    JohnnyVegas's Avatar
    JohnnyVegas is offline Knowledgeable Member- Recognized Member Winner - $100
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    The Desert
    Posts
    5,962
    Quote Originally Posted by Perseverance1

    How much dbol and how much test? Why has no one asked this yet???
    I didn't ask because everyone is different and the important thing is to start the AI at the beginning of the cycle. I recommended what is a low enough dose to not bottom most people out but gives a good starting point that can be adjusted after getting blood work done a couple of weeks in.

    This imprecise way of doing it is temporary since acne, bloating and emotional state should quickly provide clues for adjustment...even though I still recommend blood work.

  22. #22
    Mickey, you suggest a 4 wk PCT as I have planned without doubling wk 2?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200
    Quote Originally Posted by rdre1979 View Post
    Mickey, you suggest a 4 wk PCT as I have planned without doubling wk 2?
    Thats correct.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    257
    I guess I'm in the minority with believing that when test levels raise, estrogen levels raise with it and your body can balance itself. No adex needed unless you actually have side effects. I have zero issues with gyno though and high DHT levels to help that also. Even if estrogen levels are up at 300 or whatever. If you feel fine and your test levels are way above normal range also, those estrogen levels are fine.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200
    Quote Originally Posted by Allaaro View Post
    I guess I'm in the minority with believing that when test levels raise, estrogen levels raise with it and your body can balance itself. No adex needed unless you actually have side effects. I have zero issues with gyno though and high DHT levels to help that also. Even if estrogen levels are up at 300 or whatever. If you feel fine and your test levels are way above normal range also, those estrogen levels are fine.
    E2 levels at 300 are fine? Did i read that correctly? Have you any research or information on symptoms of elevated estrogen levels that you cannot "feel" or "see"?

    This is a serious question and not meant to flame.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    L.A
    Posts
    24,626
    This Is why I preach labs before during and after cycles!!

  27. #27
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by MickeyKnox View Post
    E2 levels at 300 are fine? Did i read that correctly? Have you any research or information on symptoms of elevated estrogen levels that you cannot "feel" or "see"?

    This is a serious question and not meant to flame.
    300 would be a bit exaggerated....since I'm sure there would be symptoms that you could feel or see. My main point it just you don't know how the cycle is going to affect you, why throw another chem in the mix if it's not needed? Especially when people are afraid of results on bloodwork if estrogen comes back high....and they feel great. It should be high if your on a cycle with no AI. If you aren't gyno prone, aren't bloated like crazy, mood and libido is good....don't go adding in adex just because some people on a forum tell you to. Use the medication for problems only if needed. But there could be the guy who can run 1-2grams of test and with no AI and the guy who needs AI on 500mg.....it's trial and error, with bloodwork as a guide. But don't just follow the numbers.

    It's all different for each person. Myself, I find even on TRT that E2 at bit less then double the 'ideal range' is where my 'ideal' numbers are. If I was just listening to others and going by blood results I'd still feel like shit with no libido.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    32,801
    High estrogen has alot of side effects you cant feel. So u are correct your levels will be high on cycle. And u will be hurting yourself just becausevu think u feel fine. I nevet get gyno. I can run 2 grams and not get it. I still always use an ai.
    If people can't tell your on steroids then your doing them wrong

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Allaaro

    300 would be a bit exaggerated....since I'm sure there would be symptoms that you could feel or see. My main point it just you don't know how the cycle is going to affect you, why throw another chem in the mix if it's not needed? Especially when people are afraid of results on bloodwork if estrogen comes back high....and they feel great. It should be high if your on a cycle with no AI. If you aren't gyno prone, aren't bloated like crazy, mood and libido is good....don't go adding in adex just because some people on a forum tell you to. Use the medication for problems only if needed. But there could be the guy who can run 1-2grams of test and with no AI and the guy who needs AI on 500mg.....it's trial and error, with bloodwork as a guide. But don't just follow the numbers.

    It's all different for each person. Myself, I find even on TRT that E2 at bit less then double the 'ideal range' is where my 'ideal' numbers are. If I was just listening to others and going by blood results I'd still feel like shit with no libido.
    Allaaro,

    I hear this all too often that it not only concerns me but shows me that people really do NOT spend enough time understanding the effects of manipulating hormones with steroids. While I will agree that taking too much of an AI can have undesirable and potentially harmful effects, there are far greater concerns than gyno or bloating with elevated E2. With increasing estrogen, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, heart attack, deep vein thrombosis, and strokes become a significant risk. Does this mean every person with high estrogen levels is at risk for these? No, but without a complete medical hx (which we never have with members here) its simply not possible to know who is at risk and how significant that risk may be. Moreover, strokes, heart attacks, and DVTs are often asymptomatic, yet deadly.

    It would be foolish IMO for someone to manipulate their natural hormones and assume they don't need an AI unless they are symptomatic. It creates an unnecessary risk. I will also agree the the optimal level of E2 will vary from person to person but I believe it is careless to assume one can avoid an AI unless there are clinical presentations of high estrogen. There is simply no way of knowing, a priori, what the optimal level of E2 would be for each person.

    Routine BW would be create for keeping E2 in check, but the reality is, most people don't have routine BW due to cost, insurance, access, convenience, or any other factor.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    bed, work, gym, kitchen
    Posts
    3,228
    Quote Originally Posted by MuscleInk

    Allaaro,

    I hear this all too often that it not only concerns me but shows me that people really do NOT spend enough time understanding the effects of manipulating hormones with steroids. While I will agree that taking too much of an AI can have undesirable and potentially harmful effects, there are far greater concerns than gyno or bloating with elevated E2. With increasing estrogen, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, heart attack, deep vein thrombosis, and strokes become a significant risk. Does this mean every person with high estrogen levels is at risk for these? No, but without a complete medical hx (which we never have with members here) its simply not possible to know who is at risk and how significant that risk may be. Moreover, strokes, heart attacks, and DVTs are often asymptomatic, yet deadly.

    It would be foolish IMO for someone to manipulate their natural hormones and assume they don't need an AI unless they are symptomatic. It creates an unnecessary risk. I will also agree the the optimal level of E2 will vary from person to person but I believe it is careless to assume one can avoid an AI unless there are clinical presentations of high estrogen. There is simply no way of knowing, a priori, what the optimal level of E2 would be for each person.

    Routine BW would be create for keeping E2 in check, but the reality is, most people don't have routine BW due to cost, insurance, access, convenience, or any other factor.
    That's a wicked response bro. I was reading this thread because I feel like my AI made me feel like crap last cycle. I was feeling like I should skip it this upcoming cycle but now after reading your post it make it a bit more clear as to why it is necessary.

    Sorry to jack the thread but I feel this question can help anyone else trying to understand the use of AI and e2 management... If I was taking liquidex at .25eod and felt very sluggish on cycle and often couldn't stay awake, had some moodiness and got sick randomly, could my e2 have been too low? Could I try .25mg e3d to see how I react to that? Cuz for me the only benefit of the AI that I noticed was less acne...which was great

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    435
    Awesome response MI , I have some buddies that I try and get to run an Ai but refuse to (because they don't get gyno so they think there's no need) I'm just gonna save your response and show them .

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,447
    Quote Originally Posted by >Good Luck<

    That's a wicked response bro. I was reading this thread because I feel like my AI made me feel like crap last cycle. I was feeling like I should skip it this upcoming cycle but now after reading your post it make it a bit more clear as to why it is necessary.

    Sorry to jack the thread but I feel this question can help anyone else trying to understand the use of AI and e2 management... If I was taking liquidex at .25eod and felt very sluggish on cycle and often couldn't stay awake, had some moodiness and got sick randomly, could my e2 have been too low? Could I try .25mg e3d to see how I react to that? Cuz for me the only benefit of the AI that I noticed was less acne...which was great
    AI dosing is a bit tricky. Two people can take the same dose and have very different outcomes. Another problem is that some symptoms of low E are also the same with high E (libido, ED, lethargy, joint/muscle pain, etc.). BW is more definitive for checking E2, but its not practical for most people to check it regularly. I always recommend the lowest possible dose of Adex to start: .25 EOD. Adex has a half life of nearly 48 hours, so extending your dose to E3D should pose a significant concern.

    Another option could be aromasin. One benefit of exemestane is that is has less of an effect on lipids than Adex which is a huge benefit for people prone to hypercholesterolemia an hypertension. The disadvantage of stane/aromasin is that its a "suicide inhibitor" and has more permanent effect on receptor coupling.

    Try the Adex at 0.25 E3D and see how you feel. Keep me informed. I'd be interested in your feedback.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Fllifter
    Awesome response MI , I have some buddies that I try and get to run an Ai but refuse to (because they don't get gyno so they think there's no need) I'm just gonna save your response and show them .
    Happy to help.

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    bed, work, gym, kitchen
    Posts
    3,228
    Quote Originally Posted by MuscleInk

    AI dosing is a bit tricky. Two people can take the same dose and have very different outcomes. Another problem is that some symptoms of low E are also the same with high E (libido, ED, lethargy, joint/muscle pain, etc.). BW is more definitive for checking E2, but its not practical for most people to check it regularly. I always recommend the lowest possible dose of Adex to start: .25 EOD. Adex has a half life of nearly 48 hours, so extending your dose to E3D should pose a significant concern.

    Another option could be aromasin. One benefit of exemestane is that is has less of an effect on lipids than Adex which is a huge benefit for people prone to hypercholesterolemia an hypertension. The disadvantage of stane/aromasin is that its a "suicide inhibitor" and has more permanent effect on receptor coupling.

    Try the Adex at 0.25 E3D and see how you feel. Keep me informed. I'd be interested in your feedback.
    One last thing... What the f--- is "suicide inhibitor"

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,447
    Quote Originally Posted by >Good Luck<

    One last thing... What the f--- is "suicide inhibitor"
    Well....without complicating the answer with reference to covalent bonds and such, the short answer is that aromasin permanently binds to aromatase enzymes, preventing them from converting androgen into estrogen.

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200
    Quote Originally Posted by MuscleInk View Post
    Allaaro,

    I hear this all too often that it not only concerns me but shows me that people really do NOT spend enough time understanding the effects of manipulating hormones with steroids. While I will agree that taking too much of an AI can have undesirable and potentially harmful effects, there are far greater concerns than gyno or bloating with elevated E2. With increasing estrogen, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, heart attack, deep vein thrombosis, and strokes become a significant risk. Does this mean every person with high estrogen levels is at risk for these? No, but without a complete medical hx (which we never have with members here) its simply not possible to know who is at risk and how significant that risk may be. Moreover, strokes, heart attacks, and DVTs are often asymptomatic, yet deadly.

    It would be foolish IMO for someone to manipulate their natural hormones and assume they don't need an AI unless they are symptomatic. It creates an unnecessary risk. I will also agree the the optimal level of E2 will vary from person to person but I believe it is careless to assume one can avoid an AI unless there are clinical presentations of high estrogen. There is simply no way of knowing, a priori, what the optimal level of E2 would be for each person.

    Routine BW would be create for keeping E2 in check, but the reality is, most people don't have routine BW due to cost, insurance, access, convenience, or any other factor.
    I always enjoy your responses, particularly the elegant way in which you present your medically backed up opinions.

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    16,515
    That was great info mi

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •