Results 1 to 40 of 54

Thread: Home automation

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    3,366
    Quote Originally Posted by dan68131

    You could shield it but you'd be the weirdo on the street. You can create an anechoic chamber by wrapping your house in steel.
    Something a lil less obtrusive? Lol

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,943
    Quote Originally Posted by Tron3219 View Post
    Something a lil less obtrusive? Lol
    Not really... that's the problem with ISM bands. There is no regulation. Your neighbors garage door opener literally could potentially shut off your lights or turn on your TV. Most of the time that doesn't happen because of a range issue but it CAN happen because there aren't any rules that say otherwise.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    3,366
    Quote Originally Posted by dan68131

    Not really... that's the problem with ISM bands. There is no regulation. Your neighbors garage door opener literally could potentially shut off your lights or turn on your TV. Most of the time that doesn't happen because of a range issue but it CAN happen because there aren't any rules that say otherwise.
    Gotcha...so I just did some research, and z-wave runs at 900 MHz...isn't that what the old cordless phones and CB's run on?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,943
    Quote Originally Posted by Tron3219 View Post
    Gotcha...so I just did some research, and z-wave runs at 900 MHz...isn't that what the old cordless phones and CB's run on?
    Yep, and 10,000 other things; which makes it unreliable. That's why I said go wired.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    3,366
    Quote Originally Posted by dan68131

    Yep, and 10,000 other things; which makes it unreliable. That's why I said go wired.
    How does interference happen if the device being controlled has a "node address" that has to be paired with the network address of the controller and can only be controlled by that network address? It's like pairing Bluetooth right?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,943
    The interference isn't in respects to the addressing of devices. That's part of the communications protocol. The "interference" is based on the device not even getting the data or "packet loss" per se. The engineering term is called "Near Far Syndrome". Essentially its like sticking a French dude and a German dude in a small room. Both start screaming in their own language. The problem is because both are screaming their own language you really can't make out what either are saying so you just ignore it as noise.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    3,366
    Quote Originally Posted by dan68131
    The interference isn't in respects to the addressing of devices. That's part of the communications protocol. The "interference" is based on the device not even getting the data or "packet loss" per se. The engineering term is called "Near Far Syndrome". Essentially its like sticking a French dude and a German dude in a small room. Both start screaming in their own language. The problem is because both are screaming their own language you really can't make out what either are saying so you just ignore it as noise.
    Ahhhh so it's a RF strength issue. An outside signal overpowering controller to device...gotcha...so if the controller has a strong enough transmitter or not is the problem with unreliability?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •