Quote Originally Posted by largerthannormal View Post
In all reality everything we do on on here is copied or transferred either to paper another board or repeated in another fashion or directly to out thoughts. Someone got their info from some where i was kind enough to not plagiarize.

deleted *

I still since you are the only one on this board besides me who seems to think mod grf( 91-29) is not the same as cjc 1295 w/o dac are not the same, id like you to support your answer.

If you cant then everyone else will continue to believe they are the same. (ive seen you post time and time again people who think its the same should do more research but never have seen a definitive reason why, all i ask is for a amino structure of the two to see the difference. You very well could be correct and I am not disagreeing with you, I would just like to support the info I pass on to others and have none to support your statement.

If youd be kind enough to analyze and respond that be cool, in the meantime ill delete the above information, one day ill take the time to write one up myself. maybe a simplified version
sure, i can google "chemical structure of cjc1295 and mod grf1-29" and paste the results here but that won't end the debate. too many people regurgitating sales claims made by unscrupulous retailers and broscience from gearheads. let me make a few points and ask a few questions first.

i am neither a medical doctor nor a chemist. i should not be regarded as an authority on any of these issues. if you need an authority on ****ing 2 or 3 women at the same time, ask away. i am definitively an expert there.

second, did you see my post above regarding the half lives and GH release of cjc1295 and mod grf1-29? if so, do you suppose that they are chemically the same and still have those diversely different reactions in people or that they are in fact different structures entirely and that is the difference?

third, i read in another thread that ar-r has begun editing and changing their descriptions of certain peptides that they sell. do you suppose that is because they woke up yesterday and thought "hm, i think i'll review all my product descriptions to see if there are any errors" or that they in fact have begun to receive emails from customers asking about the differences? i know what the answer is, and i commend ar-r for making the changes (although i haven't personally verified that to be the case). perhaps ar-r will now begin to sell mod grf1-29, and perhaps it will even be made in north america. then i would be a customer. keep in mind that all of these peptides, from every retailer and every country, are sold as "for research purposes only, for in vitro use only" if you think that any chinese mfr of peptides is going to give two ****s about your health problems when you injected something that was clearly sold as research in vitro use only , well, i think you'd be left holding the bag there.

is cjc1295 effective? yes, absolutely. if you want to elevate your GH levels for 5-8 days at a time then cjc1295 is just right for you. please keep in mind that doing so will end up causing the same negative feedback loop that rHGH causes and your body will adapt to that and produce little to no GH as a result. no different then testosterone really, you already have it but when you supplement with large amounts for an extended period of time it will shut down completely.

now, i don't care what color someones name is here or what products a retailer has on offer. if they try to tell me that cjc1295 and mod grf1-29 are the same thing, or that cjc1293 is just cjc1295 w/o DAC, well i'm just going to ignore them as they clearly have nothing to offer me.

expect to see some blowout sales on cjc1293 and cjc1295 w/DAC soon, as consumers become more educated on the matter there won't be a market for them anymore.