So, to lay the foundation a little bit here, I've got plenty of experience with tesosterone, among many other anabolic/androgenic substances. And I'm playing with ideologies here, to find what I respond the absolute best to. Which leads me to my current cycle (I'll spare many of the details), involving a high dose of only testosterone enanthate.
In the past, I've always carried my ancillaries on-hand, but generally never encountered any side effects. When running trenbolone at doses over 500mg per week (regardless of my testosterone dosage) there were issues with erectile disfunction, that were easily solved with proper dopamine agonists. However, in regards to estrogen related side effects, I've yet to even notice bloat (or anything else, for that matter). Fundamentally, I'm a bit of a believer in the concept of "if it ain't broken, don't fix it," or, in other words: don't introduce compounds that are not necessary.
This leads me to my question here for you guys: when I start pushing the limits on dosages, should I begin introducing an aromatase inhibitor, regardless of the fact that no estrogen related side effects are evident? Of course, I'll be utilizing bloodwork, to monitor the numbers. But what is more important, controlling the range of estrogen or controlling the side effects derived from estrogen?
Reply With Quote