Quote Originally Posted by Metalject View Post
I can't see how on earth any police officer could point towards reasonable suspicion with that video being right there for everyone to see. But for the sake of argument let's say there was, the officer would still be required to tell the individual why he's being detained, why he wants him to do this or that. This is how our law works. If you arrest someone and do not mirandize them, even if guilty as sin the arrest is invalid and the defendant goes free, all because the cop did not follow the law. Miranda v. Arizona 1966.

And I would be surprised if the kid files a lawsuit. I'm sure he could but that wasn't the point of this little deal at all. The kid was simply trying to show an example of a problem that is a huge problem, declining liberty.
Metal, take a deeper look at Miranda. An arrest does NOT require Miranda. Only during questioning AND if the subject is under arrest , is Miranda necessary. If you are placed under arrest and never questioned (happens a lot) then there is NO need for Miranda. If you choose to rattle off at the gums after being arrested but are not asked any questions...still no need for Miranda!