Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: blast and cruise vs traditional time on = time off

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,447
    Quote Originally Posted by roadglide83
    How much further ahead would one expect to be as far as muscle growth if they constantly blasted and cruise compared to traditional cycling. I understand the health risk and possible hrt down the road but with all that to the side would you see a large difference over the course of say 1-3 years?
    Simply not worth the risk. Results are typically better if you can completely cycle off between cycles and its far healthier.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by MuscleInk View Post
    Simply not worth the risk. Results are typically better if you can completely cycle off between cycles and its far healthier.
    But is it really healthier? Blasting and cruising is much easier on the hormones rather than going off and on isn't it?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •