missing week.....

[chester101]

Ahhhh to busy rehearsing your comedy routine to put constructive replies!! At least mega-mind appreciates......
My apologies.... should of learnt my lesson by now, do not question mods/pros on here..... be a sheep!!

Does anyone have an answer to original post?

[austinite]

Ahhhh to busy rehearsing your comedy routine to put constructive replies!! At least mega-mind appreciates......
My apologies.... should of learnt my lesson by now, do not question mods/pros on here..... be a sheep!!

Does anyone have an answer to original post?

Sorry buddy. If you miss one week on a long ester, just continue where you left off. 2 weeks is too much time to lose in my opinion.

[MODO]

Sorry buddy. If you miss one week on a long ester, just continue where you left off. 2 weeks is too much time to lose in my opinion.

IMO, I would figure out how many mg's you are going to skip and frontload it all at once the day before you leave. (If you are going for one week only that is).

Just skipping the whole week and picking up afterwards is shortchanging yourself I think.

[austinite]

IMO, I would figure out how many mg's you are going to skip and frontload it all at once the day before you leave. (If you are going for one week only that is).

Just skipping the whole week and picking up afterwards is shortchanging yourself I think.

I disagree with that. It wouldn't be a "frontload" really, and he would have far more unstable serum testosterone vs. skipping a week. Estrogen would be easier to manage by skipping a week vs. spiking your levels. He would merely extend his cycle by one more week.

[MODO]

I disagree with that. It wouldn't be a "frontload" really, and he would have far more unstable serum testosterone vs. skipping a week. Estrogen would be easier to manage by skipping a week vs. spiking your levels. He would merely extend his cycle by one more week.

My idea with "frontload"-ing it is to finish the vacation at a blood level equivalent to what it would be at if the cycle was done without interruption.

Personally I have tried this and found no acute sides effects from the spike. Although it is worth mentioning I've only done 500 mg/wk (or less) cycles.

I just don't like the idea of letting blood levels fall and then building them back up to stable over a few half lives worth of injections. If I had to have an acute dip in levels, I would prefer it to be an upward dip rather than downward.

But as far as end results are concerned, it might just be semantics. Anyway just my two cents. Either way will probably work nearly the same in the end.

[Bonaparte]

Ahhhh to busy rehearsing your comedy routine to put constructive replies!! At least mega-mind appreciates......
My apologies.... should of learnt my lesson by now, do not question mods/pros on here..... be a sheep!!

Does anyone have an answer to original post?

What the hell are you talking about?
You asked a stupid question that cannot be answered, so I illustrated that point through sarcasm.