Exemestane-The Underdosed AI

[bsterling]

In my post I did say it may be less in males. Id quote it and all that but I'm on my tablet.

Your right, I don't have empirical data to argue anything. I just find it bizarre that there isn't more critical thinking going on. You have a very high regard in the eyes of the people on this board and am surprised how quickly everyone jumped on board. I'm going to have to invest some money in blood work and follow up on this.

Thanks for the response.

[jimmyinkedup]

In my post I did say it may be less in males. Id quote it and all that but I'm on my tablet.

Your right, I don't have empirical data to argue anything. I just find it bizarre that there isn't more critical thinking going on. You have a very high regard in the eyes of the people on this board and am surprised how quickly everyone jumped on board. I'm going to have to invest some money in blood work and follow up on this.

Thanks for the response.

Im all for debate and discussion. Perhaps that is the case because they know that I have been here for years and am not quick to snap to judgment hastily and without foundation or experience to back the theories or ideas I put out there. The fact that I have been in this game for 20 years provably doesn't hurt either.
We are all different and all respond slightly different, however in this case I noticed a trend personally and with others across several boards, researched it, tried it personally, backed it with blood work (my own and others). It has since proven accurate with numerous accounts and supporting blood work. I really wish there was a long term study published in males, taking stane, using AAS at on cycle doses however we both know that isnt going to happen. The supporting data i used here is often, for better or worse, the most concrete foundation to formulate correct protocols we can find in this game.
The fact is stane is not the super potent ai in males that it was initially put out there to be. On paper it should be much more potent that adex, the reality is, and it has been proven time and time again, it just isnt.

[Docd187123]

Im all for debate and discussion. Perhaps that is the case because they know that I have been here for years and am not quick to snap to judgment hastily and without foundation or experience to back the theories or ideas I put out there. The fact that I have been in this game for 20 years provably doesn't hurt either.
We are all different and all respond slightly different, however in this case I noticed a trend personally and with others across several boards, researched it, tried it personally, backed it with blood work (my own and others). It has since proven accurate with numerous accounts and supporting blood work. I really wish there was a long term study published in males, taking stane, using AAS at on cycle doses however we both know that isnt going to happen. The supporting data i used here is often, for better or worse, the most concrete foundation to formulate correct protocols we can find in this game.
The fact is stane is not the super potent ai in males that it was initially put out there to be. On paper it should be much more potent that adex, the reality is, and it has been proven time and time again, it just isnt.

I happen to agree with you but only bc you have a badass avi