View Poll Results: FOR THOSE ON A CUT- How long do you wait to take your POST-Workout Shake?

Voters
11. You may not vote on this poll
  • Immediately after I walk out (10 mins)

    4 36.36%
  • Within 45 mins

    5 45.45%
  • Longer than 90 mins

    2 18.18%
Results 1 to 36 of 36

Thread: Delaying Post-Workout Shake to shed fat

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,096
    ^ I would disagree timing is irrelevant. Lots of good New studies out. Since I've started carb backloading and doing late day workouts I've noticed dramatic differences, both in workouts and body composition

  2. #2
    austinite's Avatar
    austinite is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cialis, Texas
    Posts
    31,155
    Quote Originally Posted by Machdiesel View Post
    ^ I would disagree timing is irrelevant. Lots of good New studies out. Since I've started carb backloading and doing late day workouts I've noticed dramatic differences, both in workouts and body composition
    I understand. Many will disagree.

    You can eat 2000 calories with a high sense of timing, and burn X amount of calories.

    You can also eat 2000 calories with no sense of timing, and burn X amount of calories.

    A calorie burned is a calorie burned. Same goes for intake. Both scenarios will yield the same 'end of day' result. The only relevance to timing is with respect to your energy levels, where your training and/or endurance may suffer; which would then yield lessor results. I have yet to see a study impactful enough to change my mind.
    Last edited by austinite; 08-18-2014 at 08:27 PM.
    ~ PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR SOURCE CHECKS ~

    "It's human nature in a 'more is better' society full of a younger generation that expects instant gratification, then complain when they don't get it. The problem will get far worse before it gets better". ~ kelkel

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,562
    Quote Originally Posted by austinite View Post
    I understand. Many will disagree.

    You can eat 2000 calories with a high sense of timing, and burn X amount of calories.

    You can also eat 2000 calories with no sense of timing, and burn X amount of calories.

    A calorie burned is a calorie burned. Same goes for intake. Both scenarios will yield the same 'end of day' result. The only relevance to timing is with respect to your energy levels, where your training and/or endurance may suffer; which would then yield lessor results. I have yet to see a study impactful enough to change my mind.
    so ur saying if my macro's are 3000cal and I want to cut up and I drop my calories down to 2500. if I wake up and don't eat anything all day and 8pm rolls around and I eat 2500 calories in one sitting I will be still cutting weight?

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by tice1212 View Post
    so ur saying if my macro's are 3000cal and I want to cut up and I drop my calories down to 2500. if I wake up and don't eat anything all day and 8pm rolls around and I eat 2500 calories in one sitting I will be still cutting weight?
    Correct. Law of thermodynamics.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,096
    Quote Originally Posted by austinite View Post
    I understand. Many will disagree.

    You can eat 2000 calories with a high sense of timing, and burn X amount of calories.

    You can also eat 2000 calories with no sense of timing, and burn X amount of calories.

    A calorie burned is a calorie burned. Same goes for intake. Both scenarios will yield the same 'end of day' result. The only relevance to timing is with respect to your energy levels, where your training and/or endurance may suffer; which would then yield lessor results. I have yet to see a study impactful enough to change my mind.
    So according to you keeping calories constant, a person who decides to inject 500mg of testosterone, and take 40mg of dbol won't gain Weignt . This is an extreme case or changing your bodies physiology/hormones that alter what they do with those calories. Same goes for timing to a lesser extent. People see calories out as this finite number that is just energy burned. Your body is more complex then that. Now we may be talking about very small differencs, but I think timing can A. Enhance performance and B. Allow for optimal nutrient portioning and show A better end result in terms of body composition

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,096
    Quote Originally Posted by austinite View Post
    I understand. Many will disagree.

    You can eat 2000 calories with a high sense of timing, and burn X amount of calories.

    You can also eat 2000 calories with no sense of timing, and burn X amount of calories.

    A calorie burned is a calorie burned. Same goes for intake. Both scenarios will yield the same 'end of day' result. The only relevance to timing is with respect to your energy levels, where your training and/or endurance may suffer; which would then yield lessor results. I have yet to see a study impactful enough to change my mind.
    Here's a real world example. I used to have high blood sugar, fasted 120 and a1c 6.0. Since then I've switched to a back loading approach. Post Workout I consume 50g of whey and 50g of pure dextrose. If I take my blood sugar every 30 minutes it never goes over 110, yet if I went into labcorp at 9am and took a glucose tolerance test which I believe is 75g of carbs I'd fail. I now have normal blood sugar levels

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Machdiesel View Post
    ^ I would disagree timing is irrelevant. Lots of good New studies out. Since I've started carb backloading and doing late day workouts I've noticed dramatic differences, both in workouts and body composition
    Timing is irrelevant bc it's solely up to the individual in question. I can train fasted or completely full, take a PWO shake right after or wait a few hours to eat, I can eat once a day or 8x a day and nothing makes much of a difference. Some cannot train fasted while others can. Some cannot train on a full stomach where others must. Hence the irrelevant statement.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,096
    Quote Originally Posted by Docd187123 View Post
    Timing is irrelevant bc it's solely up to the individual in question. I can train fasted or completely full, take a PWO shake right after or wait a few hours to eat, I can eat once a day or 8x a day and nothing makes much of a difference. Some cannot train fasted while others can. Some cannot train on a full stomach where others must. Hence the irrelevant statement.
    So your saying its EXTRMELY Relevent, just different for every individual

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Machdiesel View Post
    So your saying its EXTRMELY Relevent, just different for every individual
    Not exactly bc even then the differences are so minor it's not worth fretting over.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •